Dayton Daily News

EPA reauthoriz­es cyanide bombs to kill wild animals

Critics argue there are safer alternativ­es.

- Mariel Padilla ©2019 The New York Times

Despite strong opposition from environmen­talists and others, the federal Environmen­tal Protection Agency announced this past week that it had reauthoriz­ed the use of spring-loaded poison devices known as “cyanide bombs” to kill coyotes, foxes and other animals that prey on livestock.

The devices, called M-44s, have been used continuous­ly for more than four decades by Wildlife Services, a program within the U.S. Department of Agricultur­e. When a predator stumbles across one of these devices, a capsule containing sodium cyanide, a highly toxic pesticide, is ejected into its mouth.

In 2017, the WildEarth Guardians and the Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit that asked the EPA to ban the use of sodium cyanide, generating a review of the program. The agency announced it would continue using M-44s on an interim basis, but would toughen restrictio­ns based on its review.

Last year, the devices killed more than 6,500 animals across the country, according to the Department of Agricultur­e. More than 200 of the animals killed — including foxes, raccoons, opossums, skunks, swine and a black bear — were unintentio­nal targets of the cyanide bombs.

The Center for Biological Diversity, an environmen­tal advocacy group, condemned the decision to reauthoriz­e the devices, saying that they “inhumanely and indiscrimi­nately” kill thousands of animals every year.

When the EPA proposed the renewed use of M-44s last year, the public was invited to submit comments through March. More than 20,000 letters were submitted in opposition to the proposal, “an overwhelmi­ng majority,” according to the EPA’s decision.

Many people argued there were safer alternativ­es available, that the M-44s killed nontargete­d wildlife and that too many pets and people were accidental­ly exposed to the devices in residentia­l areas.

Some groups wrote in favor of the devices, according to the EPA. These included the Wyoming Wool Growers Associatio­n, the Texas Sheep and Goat Raisers Associatio­n and the Texas Wildlife Damage Management Associatio­n that emphasized how much money was lost when livestock was killed by wild animals.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States