Dayton Daily News

If Biden’s collapse worsens, Sanders clearly will benefit

- Marc A. Thiessen Marc A. Thiessen writes for the Washington Post.

Now that both Sen. Elizabeth Warren and former Vice President Joe Biden have left New Hampshire with possibly mortal wounds, who would benefit most if they dropped out? The convention­al wisdom holds that a Warren implosion would help her fellow progressiv­e, Sen. Bernie Sanders, while a Biden implosion would aid the so-called moderates — former mayors Pete Buttigieg and Mike Bloomberg — and Sen. Amy Klobuchar. Yet Sanders may stand to gain from exits by Warren and Biden.

Warren’s distant fourthplac­e finish in New Hampshire was obviously a good omen for Sanders. A January Pew poll found that 36% of Warren’s supporters would back Sanders if she were no longer in the race, compared with just 3% going to Bloomberg, 4% going to Klobuchar and 13% going to Buttigieg. As Warren sheds voters, her troubles will likely give Sanders a significan­t boost. More surprising, however, is that a Biden collapse could also benefit Sanders. According to Pew, 21% of Biden voters said they would switch allegiance to Sanders if Biden were not in the race — more than would go to any other candidate. Biden, Bloomberg and Klobuchar all ranked in the single digits.

Why would Biden supporters name Sanders as their second choice? Biden attacked Sanders’ socialist proposals as unrealisti­c and unaffordab­le. But Biden’s draw for many Democrats was not his moderate ideology; it was his perceived electabili­ty. Many Sanders supporters might have backed Biden this time around because their priority was to defeat Trump. They went with their heads and not their hearts. But now that the Biden electabili­ty myth has been shattered, some of these voters might decide to go with their hearts after all.

In other words, if Warren and Biden leave the race, or suffer mass defections, it could help Sanders not only to consolidat­e the progressiv­e vote but also to eat away at some of the more moderate vote.

Many centrist Democrats looked at the New Hampshire returns and consoled themselves that Buttigieg and Klobuchar got a combined 44.2%, a nearly 10-point lead over the Sanders and Warren combined 34.9%, and concluded that all that is needed to stop Sanders is for more moderates to drop out. It’s more complicate­d. Not all Warren voters go to Sanders. And plenty of voters now supporting moderates may end up supporting Sanders if their first choice leaves the race.

There are reasons for that. First, the moderates in the Democratic race are moderate only when compared with Sanders. This is the most radically left-wing field of Democrats ever to run for president. When the candidates were asked if they would be uncomforta­ble with a socialist leading the Democratic ticket, only Klobuchar and Tom Steyer raised their hands.

And the only difference between Medicare-for-all (favored by Sanders and Warren) and “Medicare for all who want it” (also known as the public option, favored by Buttigieg, Bloomberg and Klobuchar) is that the former would eliminate private insurance instantly, while the latter would subject it to a slow, painful death.

So it’s not a big ideologica­l jump for many Democratic voters to embrace Sanders. Indeed, millions of have done so before. In 2016, Sanders won 12,029,699 votes in the primaries. Many of his 2016 supporters are now backing others. These voters have already pulled the lever for Sanders once, so if their current choices stumble, that residual allegiance may draw them back.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States