Dayton Daily News

SWEDEN

- AGENCY VIA AP

Ever since the coronaviru­s emerged in Europe, Sweden has captured internatio­nal attention by conducting an unorthodox, open-air experiment. It has allowed the world to examine what happens in a pandemic when a government allows life to carry on largely unhindered.

This is what has happened: Not only have thousands more people died than in neighborin­g countries that imposed lockdowns, but Sweden’s economy has fared little better.

“They literally gained nothing,” said Jacob F. Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for Internatio­nal Economics in Washington. “It’s a self-inflicted wound, and they have no economic gains.”

The results of Sweden’s experience are relevant well beyond Scandinavi­an shores. In the United States, where the virus is spreading with alarming speed, many states have — at President Donald Trump’s urging — avoided lockdowns or lifted them prematurel­y on the assumption that this would foster eco- nomic revival, allowing peo- ple to return to workplaces, shops and restaurant­s.

In Britain, Prime Minister Boris Johnson — previously hospitaliz­ed with COVID-19 — reopened pubs and restau- rants last weekend in a bid to restore normal economic life.

Implicit i n these approaches is the assump- tion that government­s must balance saving lives against the imperative to spare jobs,

A woman looks at face masks for sale in Stockholm in June. with the extra health risks of rolling back social distancing potentiall­y justified by a resulting boost to prosper- ity. But Sweden’s grim result — more death and nearly equal economic damage — suggests that the supposed choice between lives and paychecks is a false one: A failure to impose social distancing can cost lives and jobs at the same time.

Sweden put stock in the sensibilit­y of its people as it largely avoided imposing government prohibitio­ns. The government allowed restau- rants, gyms, shops, playground­s and most schools to remain open. By contrast, Denmark and Norway opted for strict quarantine­s, banning large groups and lock- ing down shops and restau- rants.

More than three months later, the coronaviru­s is blamed for 5,420 deaths in Sweden, according to the World Health Organizati­on. That might not sound espe- cially horrendous compared with the more than 129,000 Americans who have died. But Sweden is a country of only 10 million people. Per million people, Sweden has suffered 40% more deaths than the United States, 12 times more than Norway, seven times more than Finland and six times more than Denmark.

The elevated death toll resulting from Sweden’s approach has been clear for many weeks. What is only now emerging is how Sweden, despite letting its economy run unimpeded, has still suffered business-destroying, prosperity-diminishin­g damage and at nearly the same magnitude of its neighbors.

Sweden’s central bank expects its eco n omy to contract by 4.5% this year, a revision from a previously expected gain of 1.3%. The unemployme­nt rate jumped to 9% in May from 7.1% in March. “The overall damage to the economy means the recovery will be protracted, with unemployme­nt remaining elevated,” Oxford Economics concluded in a recent research note.

This is more or less how damage caused by the pandemic has played out in Denmark, where the central bank expects that the economy will shrink 4.1% this year and where joblessnes­s has edged up to 5.6% in May from 4.1% in March.

In short, Sweden suffered a vastly higher death rate while failing to collect on the expected economic gains.

The coronaviru­s does not stop at national borders. Despite the government’s decision to allow the domestic economy to roll on, Swedish businesses are stuck with the same conditions that produced recession everywhere else. And Swedish people responded to the fear of the virus by limiting their shopping — not enough to prevent elevated deaths but enough to produce a decline in business activity.

Here is one takeaway with potentiall­y universal import: It is simplistic to portray government actions such as quarantine­s as the cause of economic damage. The real culprit is the virus itself. From Asia to Europe to the Americas, the risks of the pandemic have disrupted businesses while prompt- ing people to avoid shop- ping malls and restaurant­s, regardless of official policy.

Sweden is exposed to the vagaries of global trade. Once the pandemic was unleashed, it was certain to suffer the economic consequenc­es, said Kirkegaard, the econ- omist.

“The Swedish manufactur- ing sector shut down when everyone else shut down because of the supply chain situation,” he said. “This was entirely predictabl­e.”

What remained in the government’s sphere of influence was how many people would die.

“There is just no question- ing and no willingnes­s from the Swedish government to really change tack, until it’s too late,” Kirkegaard said. “Which is astonishin­g, given that it’s been clear for quite some time that the economic gains that they claim to have gotten from this are just nonexisten­t.”

Norway, on the other hand, was not only quick to impose an aggressive lockdown, but early to relax it as the virus slowed, and as the government ramped up testing. It is now expected to see a more rapid economic turnaround. Norway’s central bank predicts that its mainland economy — excluding the turbulent oil and gas sector — will contract by 3.9% this year. That amounts to a marked improvemen­t over the 5.5% decline expected in the midst of the lockdown.

Collective­ly, Scandinavi­an consumers are expected to continue spending far more robustly than in the United States, said Thomas Harr, global head of research at Danske Bank, emphasizin­g those nations’ generous social safety nets, including national health care systems. Americans, by contrast, tend to rely on their jobs for health care, making them more cautious about their health and their spending during the pandemic, knowing that hospitaliz­ation can be a gateway to financial calamity.

“It’s very much about the welfare state,” Harr said of Scandinavi­an countries. “You’re not as concerned about catching the virus, because you know that, if you do, the state is paying for health care.”

 ?? STINA STJERNKVIS­T / TT NEWS ??
STINA STJERNKVIS­T / TT NEWS
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States