Landmark conservation bill sent to the president
The nation’s conservation community achieved a long-standing goal Wednesday when the House passed and sent to President Donald Trump a measure that for the first time guarantees maximum annual funding for the premiere federal program to acquire and preserve land for public use.
Fueled by election-year politics, the legislation was easily approved on a bipartisan 310-107 vote. It would allocate $900 million each year to the Land and Water Conservation Fund while also providing up to $9.5 billion over five years to begin clearing up a mounting maintenance backlog at national parks.
Conservation leaders hailed the measure as a landmark achievement. They said it would protect and expand access to public lands at a time when Americans are gaining in appreciation for outdoor activities because of the pandemic, while providing tens of thousands of jobs in tourism-dependent communities that have seen their economies suffer because of reduced travel.
“Passing the Great American Outdoors Act is quite simply the most significant investment in conservation in decades,” said Collin O’Mara, the president of the National Wildlife Federation. “It’s a huge win for wildlife, our national treasures, our economy and all Americans who enjoy our public lands for solace, recreation and exercise, especially amid this pandemic.”
Established in 1964, the fund is supposed to distribute revenues from oil and gas drilling royalties paid to the government for public land improvement as well as acquisition from willing sellers. But Congress has regularly siphoned money away from it, shortchanging the efforts. The fund was made permanent last year, but the legislation approved Wednesday was viewed as a critical final step to assure its full allotment of dollars.
“This act provides critical support for longstanding efforts to protect the public lands, restore public places to be safer and more enjoyable, and increase access to nature for all communities,” said Jennifer Morris, the chief executive officer of the Nature Conservancy. “This commitment to conservation will pay economic, health and society dividends for generations to come.”
The legislation benefited from a unique confluence of political factors that made its approval possible. Some Western lawmakers have consistently opposed fully funding the measure, arguing that it would encourage the government to acquire more private property in their states when federal holdings are already too extensive.
“Increasing the federal real estate holdings should not be on anyone’s to-do list,” said Rep. Kevin Hern, R-Okla., who said the bill ceded too much power to political appointees and the bureaucracy.
Other critics complained about the impact on the deficit, and the Trump administration budget plan earlier this year was to eliminate spending on the program altogether.
But two Senate Republicans from the West facing tough reelection fights — Cory Gardner of Colorado and
Steve Daines of Montana — seized on the measure as beneficial both for their states and for their election prospects, and won the backing of their Senate leadership. Combined with near-universal support from Democrats, the Republican backing provided strong momentum for the legislation.
The turning point came this year when Daines and Gardner visited the White House and persuaded the president that signing the measure would provide him with a significant conservation legacy. Trump agreed on the spot to sign the bill if it reached his desk.
Trump renewed his fullthroated endorsement Wednesday, thanking Gardner and Daines on Twitter for their efforts on this “HISTORIC BILL!”