Dayton Daily News

Food stamp boost in virus bill garners support

- By Andrew Taylor

A key Senate Republican said Tuesday he supports an increase in the food stamp benefit as part of a huge coronaviru­s relief bill, adding that an agreement on that issue could lead to fur- ther overall progress on the legislatio­n, which remains stalled despite days of Cap- itol negotiatio­ns.

Senate Agricultur­e Committee Chair Pat Roberts, R-Kan., said “you can make an argument that we need some kind of an increase” in food stamps and that he’s raised the topic with Major- ity Leader Mitch McConnell.

“They are taking a look at it and I think we can get a positive result,” Roberts said. “If we can get a breakthrou­gh on that, it could lead to some other stuff.”

The food st a mp issue — left out of earlier relief bills — is a top priority for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, among other powerful Demo- crats, who have passed a 15% increase in the food stamp benefit as part of their $3.5 trillion coronaviru­s relief bill.

The overall talks are going slowly, though urgency is growing among Senate Republican­s, several of whom face tough election races and are eager to deliver a bill before heading home to campaign this month.

Multiple obstacles remain, including an impasse on extending a $600-per-week pandemic jobless benefit, funding for the U.S. Postal Service and aid to renters facing eviction. Democratic negotiator­s spoke of progress after meeting with admin- istration officials on Monday but Republican­s remain privately pessimisti­c. The two sides were expected to resume talks again Tuesday afternoon.

Neither side has budged from their positions, with Democrats demanding an extension of the $600-per- week supplement­al unem- ployment benefit that’s cred- ited with propping up the economy. Republican­s have yet to offer any aid to states to prevent furloughs, layoffs and cuts to services. Both will have to compromise before a deal can be agreed to.

“The $600 unemployme­nt insurance benefit is essential because there are no jobs to go back to,” House Demo- cratic Caucus Chair Hakeem

Jeffries of New York said on MSNBC on Tuesday morning. “We’ve got to help out everyday Americans. That’s a line in the sand.”

Senate Republican­s fac- ing reelection in this fall’s turbulent political environmen­t are among those most anxious for an agree- ment. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said Monday that the chamber should not go on recess without passing the huge relief measure, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., offered a jobless ben- efit proposal that’s more generous than a pending GOP alternativ­e. Both are facing closer-than-hoped reelection bids in states that should be easy holds for Republican­s.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, a lead nego- tiator for President Donald Trump, said Monday that “we continue to make a little bit of progress” and that the administra­tion is not insistent on a smallbore approach centered on extending the supplement­al unemployme­nt benefit and leaving other items for later. A GOP move to advance a slimmed-down relief pack- age has been a recent point of conflict, with Democrats insisting there must be a com- prehensive deal.

“We’re open to a bigger package if we can reach an agreement,” Mnuchin said after Monday’s two hour meeting with Democrats.

Speaking to reporters after Monday’s session, Democratic negotiator­s pressed the case for additional food aid, funding for the Postal Service, and the $600-per- week jobless benefit that lapsed last week. The ben- efit has helped sustain consumer demand over recent months as the coronaviru­s has wrought havoc. Pelosi, D-Calif., wants to extend it through January at a $400 bil- lion-plus cost, while Republi- cans are proposing an imme- diate cut to $200 and then replacing the benefit with a cumbersome system that would attempt to provide 70% of a worker’s “replace- ment wage.”

“It was productive, we’re moving down the track. We still have our difference­s, we are trying to have a clearer understand­ing of what the needs are, and the needs are that millions of children in our country are food insecure,” Pelosi said.

On the Senate floor, McConnell, R-Ky., re-upped his complaint that Democrats are taking too tough a line. McConnell is not a direct participan­t in the talks but is likely to be an important force in closing out any potential agreement.

Most members of the Dem- ocratic-controlled House have left Washington and won’t return until there is an agreement to vote on, but the GOP-held Senate is trapped in the capital.

“I can’t see how we can go home and tell people we’ve failed, so I think that’s going to be a lot of pressure on everybody to come up with something,” said Cornyn, a close ally of McConnell. “It really is a matter of will. It’s not a matter of substance at this point. This is just a pain- ful period between people finally deciding OK, we want a deal, and then what that deal will ultimately look like.”

Areas of agreement already include another round of $1,200 direct payments and changes to the Paycheck Protection Pro- gram to permit especially hard-hit businesses to obtain another loan under gener- ous forgivenes­s terms.

On unemployme­nt, Pelosi said she’d consider reducing the $600 benefit for people in states with lower unemployme­nt rates. Republican­s want to cut the benefit to encourage beneficiar­ies to return to work and say it is bad policy since it pays many jobless people more money than they made at their previous jobs.

Graham is among the Republi c a ns who most aggressive­ly protested the $600 benefit when it passed in March, But on Monday, he said that wants to replace it with a system ensuring 100% of replacemen­t wages.

The House passed a $3.5 trillion measure in May, but Republican­s controllin­g the Senate have demanded a slower approach, saying it was necessary to take a “pause” before passing additional legislatio­n. Since they announced that strategy, however, coronaviru­s caseloads have spiked and the economy has absorbed an enormous blow.

The Senate GOP measure carries a $1.1 trillion price tag, according to an estimate by the Committee for a Responsibl­e Federal Budget.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States