Dayton Daily News

A new report said 6 feet may not be enough for social distance

- ByMilanPol­k

Six months into the pandemic, there is talk of reexaminin­g the 6 feet social distancing guideline.

The BMJ released a report arguing 6 feet is only a minimum for safe social distancing. Instead of one official distance, researcher­s suggested a graded recommenda­tion depending on factors includingw­hether someone is singing versus talking or interactin­g indoors or outdoors.

Dr. Emily Land on, executive medical director of infection prevention and control at the University of Chicago Medicine, said the paper could be a helpful resource. “I think this is a great chart that sort of gives you an understand­ing of why we have to keep the 6 feet (rule),” Landon said.

She explained that COVID19 is a virus spread through droplets, which don’t usually travel past 6 feet. Although it is detected in aerosols, like coughing or sneezing, it’s still unclear howmuch transmissi­on is driven by those methods. Researcher­s created a chart within the report by which people can gauge the level of risk for indoor or outdoor gatherings, andwhether someone is wearing a mask. Landon said the report could be helpful for people to calculate risk factors, like how many people are in a room and how far away we stand from one another.

Dr. Michael Lin is an infectious­disease specialist at Rush University Medical Center. He said the chart may not be easy for regular people to follow, since it’s already difficult to get people to stick to masks, distancing and hand-washing. “I think it’s well meaning but overly complicate­d and in public health, there’s a real imperative to be clear oncommunic­ation,” Lin said.

Lin also said distance is only one aspect of transmissi­on. How long you’re with someone is another factor. Passing by someone on the sidewalk is much different than standing and talking .“Because these types of encounters are brief and they’re outdoors, I think the risk is negligible,” Lin said.

Standing outside at 6 feet apart with masks should be fine, Landon said, but inside is adifferent story. If youplan on eating in a restaurant, for example, she said 8 feet might be better than 6 feet since it means a number of people interactin­g in a small space.

“Think about it as 10 peoplehavi­ng abookclub inyour living roomversus 10 people having a book club in a gymnasium,” Landon said.

Inside, Landon said, part of the concern is proper ventilatio­n. Outside, there’s an unlimited amount of fresh air so the virus can’t become trapped. Indoors, without the introducti­on of new air, there may be an increased risk. In hospitals, ventilatio­n systems exchange air at least sixtimesin­anhour. Inregular buildings, like restaurant­s or libraries, theremay be fewer air exchanges. Plus, turning up the heat or AC can make it difficult for common ventilatio­n systems to filter air. Landon said indoors, both proper distance and wearing a mask are imperative.

“When you’re inside, it needs to be mask and distance so there’s enough air to dilute any droplets that get out from around the mask, and the other people’smasks around you,” Landon said.

Overall, both Lin and Landon said the 6 feet apart rule is still a decent guideline, pluswearin­g amaskwheth­er you’re inside or outside.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States