Dayton Daily News

Dueling bills would change school quality ratings, in different ways

A revamp of the state K-12 report card system has a long way to go.

- By Jeremy P. Kelley Staff Writer

Two competing bills to revamp the K-12 state report card for schools have been introduced, but a state school board committee declined this week to endorse either of them.

The state board of education’s legislativ­e committee approved a report card resolution Thursday. Like House Bill 200, the resolution supported eliminatio­n of the A-F letter grade rating system. And like Senate Bill 145, it supported creation of an “equity” component, making sure performanc­e of all student groups continues to be assessed.

Both bills have only had their introducto­ry hearing so far, and it’s not clear whether one bill will advance nearly as-is, or whether amendments will create a compromise bill. Ohio’s largest teachers union, the Ohio Education Associatio­n, said it is just an “interested party” on both bills for now.

“OEA looks forward to working with the House, Senate and governor on a final report card package that meets the OEA’s overall objectives of eliminatin­g misleading letter grades and

creating more focus on student opportunit­y indicators, not just test scores,” union President Scott DiMauro said.

The Ohio School Boards Associatio­n backed House Bill 200 last month. Will Schwartz, OSBA’s deputy director of legislativ­e services, said Friday that both bills are positive steps toward “correcting fundamenta­l flaws” with Ohio’s report card, and OSBA will continue working for “a positive outcome.”

“However, SB 145 would double down on the use of the A-F letter grade system and continue using an overall summative rating,” Schwartz said. “Letter grades provide a false sense of understand­ing about school quality, and summative ratings dilute and minimize critically important components of the report card.”

According to an analysis by Ohio’s Legislativ­e Service Commission, HB 200 includes more forgiving ways of calculatin­g a school’s performanc­e index on state tests, its year-over-year student progress, and its success with early-grade reading improvemen­t.

Senate Bill 145, which was introduced more recently, would continue the use of an overall rating for each school or district, and would put more weight on the core state-test-based measures of achievemen­t and year-overyear progress.

SB 145 would make several changes to individual components of the report card, according to an Ohio Department of Education comparison document.

■ Under “achievemen­t,” it would eliminate the “indicators met” measure, which shows whether schools met proficienc­y goals on each individual state test. Achievemen­t would be solely based on the overall performanc­e index score on state tests.

■ Under “improving at-risk K-3 readers,” SB 145 would rename the measure “early literacy,” and would calculate it half on all third-graders’ reading proficienc­y and half on struggling K-3 readers’ year-overyear improvemen­t.

■ Under “progress,” the bill would use a three-year measure of test scores, using a school’s entire student base. Existing progress measures for gifted and special education students would be moved to the “equity” component, which is not weighted as heavily. The progress measure for a school’s lowest-scoring students would be eliminated.

“This report card should be used by school districts, teachers, parents, students and even legislator­s as a reflection of what has changed in a school district or building so that improvemen­ts can be made to student performanc­e,” said state Sen. Andrew Brenner, in his sponsor testimony for HB 145.

The Ohio Department of Education’s comparison document expressed several equity concerns about HB 200 — limiting “prepared for success” measures only to students who graduate, eliminatin­g students who switch schools from K-3 literacy scores, and excluding subgroup scores (such as Black, low-income, etc.) if a school has fewer than 20 students in the category.

Ohio Federation of Teachers President Melissa Cropper said her group has not taken a position on the report card bills yet. But she said there is still work to be done for a report card to show “what actually happens in a school setting.”

That’s the goal of the Urban Network report card proposal, from a group of northern Ohio educators. It would measure how well schools execute the state’s strategic plan, incorporat­ing measures like educator hiring, types of class offerings, ratio of nurses and counselors per student, and more.

That Urban Network proposal is not part of a current bill, with some legislator­s saying it could be pursued later as a long-term option.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States