New York sheriff defends decision to charge ex-governor
A CLARKSVILLE, N.Y. — New York sheriff on Friday defended his decision to file a criminal complaint against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo without consulting prosecutors or the accuser, a woman who says the Democrat groped her late last year.
But Sheriff Craig Apple said he was confident in the strength of the case, which he said was based on witness interviews and voluminous records.
“I feel very confident that the district attorney is going to prosecute this,” he told reporters at a news conference in Albany, the state capital. The sheriff said he spoke with the district attorney after Thursday’s filing, but declined to share what was said.
When asked if the governor would be arrested, Apple simply responded, “Yes.”
The one-page complaint filed in Albany City Court accuses Cuomo of forcible touching by putting his hand under a woman’s shirt on Dec. 7.
The complaint did not name the woman, but she has identified herself as Brittany Commisso, who worked as one of Cuomo’s executive assistants before he resigned amid sexual harassment allegations in August.
Forcible touching is a misdemeanor in New York, punishable by up to a year in jail, though many cases for firsttime offenders are resolved with probation or a shorter jail sentence.
After the charge was filed, the Albany County District Attorney’s Office said that it had not been informed ahead of time. It has been conducting its own investigation and was expected to take the lead on a decision about whether to prosecute.
Commisso’s lawyer, Brian Premo, said he had also expected the district attorney’s office to handle the case.
“I have no doubt that the sheriff ’s investigators did a thorough job,” Premo told Albany radio station Talk 1300. “I have no doubt that they believe in their case. I have no issue with any of that. It’s just that this is a politically charged matter, right? ... So I think it’s only prudent to allow the prosecutorial authority to have a say in how the investigation is conducted and whether there’s a prosecution, right?”
The former governor is scheduled to be arraigned Nov. 17, but Apple said that court date remains fluid.
In an interview earlier in the day with Talk 1300, Apple said it was “disheartening” that the court system made the criminal complaint public immediately, something he described as a “leak,” although such court filings are public in New York and are routinely made available to reporters.
“We didn’t want everybody to know exactly what we were doing because we didn’t want all this, the circus,” Apple said on the radio program, as he sought to explain the confusion over the complaint’s filing Thursday.
“We weren’t expecting a five-minute turnaround” for the court to decide whether to issue a summons or a warrant, he said later, adding that the confusion would have no effect on a “solid case.”