Dayton Daily News

What DeSantis got right — and what he got wrong — on Ukraine

- Marc A. Thiessen Marc A. Thiessen writes for The Washington Post.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) is a professed admirer of Ronald Reagan and is launching his national book tour with a speech at the Reagan presidenti­al library next month. That’s good because not since the 1980s has the world needed Reaganite leadership more.

Here at home, President Joe Biden’s disastrous policies have unleashed the worst inflation in four decades, while abroad an expansioni­st Russia has invaded one of its neighbors — and a “no limits” partnershi­p between Moscow and Beijing threatens the peace and stability of the free world. Many hope DeSantis will be the leader who can pull the country out of its malaise and make it “Morning in America” again. Which is why the governor’s “Fox & Friends” interview on Monday on Ukraine was so disappoint­ing. DeSantis’ first foray into foreign policy as a potential 2024 standard-bearer was less than fully Reaganesqu­e.

Let’s start with what he got right. DeSantis said: “I don’t think any of this would have happened [in Ukraine], but for the weakness that the president showed during his first year in office, culminatin­g, of course, in the disastrous withdrawal in Afghanista­n.” His critique of the reason Vladimir Putin invaded is spot-on: After Biden’s unconditio­nal surrender to the Taliban in 2021, the Russian tyrant decided he could get away with seizing Ukraine.

DeSantis went on: “I think it would behoove them to identify what is the strategic objective that they’re trying to achieve, but just saying it’s an open-ended blank check, that is not acceptable.” DeSantis is right the president has said that the United States will support Ukraine for “as long as it takes.” While that might sound resolute, things are actually taking much longer than necessary because Biden is slow-rolling military aid to Ukraine.

Biden waited more than nine months to give Ukraine just one Patriot air-defense system, allowing Putin to shell 214 schools and 683 hospitals and clinics, by CBS News’s count, causing untold civilian deaths. And Biden still refuses to give the Ukrainians the longer-range missiles and F-16 fighters they need to push Russia out of territory it unlawfully seized. This refusal is a recipe not for victory but for a protracted stalemate.

It is one thing if by his blank-check statement DeSantis means that the United States needs a clear strategy. But it is something else if he is saying the time has come to pull the plug on further aid.

When asked about Biden’s surprise visit to Kyiv, DeSantis had an un-Reaganesqu­e response: “While he’s over there, I think I and many Americans are thinking to ourselves: OK, he’s very concerned about those borders halfway around the world. He’s not done anything to secure our own border here at home. We’ve had millions and millions of people pour in, tens of thousands of Americans dead because of fentanyl, and then, of course, we just suffered a national humiliatio­n of having China fly a spy balloon clear across the continenta­l United States.”

DeSantis is right that Biden’s failure to secure our southern border is a disgrace, as was his weak response to China’s incursion into U.S. airspace. But it does not follow from Biden’s failure to secure our border and skies that we should not support Ukraine’s fight for freedom.

DeSantis declared: “These things can escalate, and I don’t think it’s in our interests to be getting into a proxy war with China.” Actually, the real escalation risk comes not from helping Ukraine defend its borders but from a failure to do so. If the Russian invasion of Ukraine was a failure of deterrence, as DeSantis correctly claims, how much bigger a deterrence failure would it be if China saw Putin succeed in Ukraine? A Russian victory would make it more, not less, likely that China invades Taiwan.

Too many so-called conservati­ves today are emulating the Democrats of Reagan’s time — embracing defense cuts, opposing aid to freedom fighters, and wringing their hands that standing up for liberty could unleash World War III. We need a leader who will embrace the Reagan Doctrine, restore Reagan’s policies of peace through strength, and make clear that this new cold war will end the way the last one did: “We win, they lose.”

Is Ron DeSantis that leader? He’ll have another chance to tell us on March 5 at the Reagan library.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States