Dayton Daily News

Grandparen­ts, hold on to your hats

- John Rosemond Parenting Visit family psychologi­st John Rosemond’s website at johnrosemo­nd.com; readers may send him email at questions@rosemond.com; due to the volume of mail, not every question will be answered.

Our Question of the Week is, “Pray tell, what is ‘outdated’ about obedience, respect, proper manners and humility?”

Said QOTW is prompted by numerous grandparen­ts who have informed me that they are not qualified, apparently, to care for their grandchild­ren because they are not hip to the most up-to-date parenting methods. They reprimand their grandchild­ren when they misbehave, for example. Or, even more egregious, said grandparen­ts absolutely refuse to negotiate in the face of tantrums.

One particular­ly abusive grandmothe­r, when her 5-year-old granddaugh­ter bit another child during a play date, confined the little vampire to her room for several hours.

“Did you talk to her about other ways of expressing anger?” the hip parents asked when they arrived home.

Her answer being “No, I did not,” grandma is no longer allowed to have unsupervis­ed visits, lest she further damage the child’s psyche.

The 5-year-old’s therapist (aka enabler-for-hire) recommende­d the suspension, by the way, claiming that continuing contact with grandma might result in “setbacks.”

Apparently, the grandmothe­r’s presence at the play date caused the child to feel anxious, which she expressed by biting. The child was simply responding to grandma’s palpable “negativity.” One must never forget that children misbehave not because they are inherently narcissist­ic, but because other people cause them to feel certain things.

Another set of grandparen­ts allowed their grandchild­ren, ages 7 and 4, to eat geneticall­y modified foods while at their house for an extended weekend. Upon discoverin­g this nutritiona­l catastroph­e, the parents made the criminals sign a contract in which they pledged to never feed the grandkids anything but foods from a list prepared by the children’s bodyguards.

You can’t make this stuff up.

Sixty years ago, who would have predicted personal computers, smartphone­s and a ubiquity of parents who all claim to be raising immaculate beings who are incapable of even thinking bad thoughts? The word “bad” is so judgmental, anyway. People who use it should not be allowed to publicly advocate for a retro-parenting revolution featuring the return of families that are adult-centered, parents who are husband and wife first, mom and dad second, and children who possess respect for adults, proper manners and inquiring minds.

Yes, folks, there was a time not so long ago when humility was the ideal, not a high level of esteem for one’s sorry self.

This business of restrictin­g or downright barring grandparen­ts from the lives of their grandchild­ren — I’m assuming the former are morally upright people who simply do not hold with a post1960s approach to raising children — is symptomati­c of the neo-progressiv­e notion that not only are new ideas better than old ones, but the old ones are downright dangerous and must be erased from the record.

Despite child mental health being considerab­ly better when children were second-class citizens, cherished but not given a vote, the new ideas are winning the popularity contest. Therefore, my advice to grandparen­ts is rather pessimisti­c: Hold on to your hats. It’s not getting better anytime soon.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States