Dayton Daily News

Is union resurgence real? Does it matter for workers?

- Veronique de Rugy is the George Gibbs Chair in Political Economy and a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Unions are said to be having a moment. The story goes something like this: Helped by a presidenti­al administra­tion that touts itself as the “most pro-union in history,” labor unions — after decades of decline — are winning big victories against anti-union corporatio­ns and extracting impressive concession­s for workers. But is it all true?

There has certainly been a lot of union activity. Last year we witnessed a significan­t increase in strikes and threats of strikes. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the country lost 16.6 million labor days to work stoppages last year. You have to go all the way back to 2000 to find this level of union disturbanc­e.

In addition, the United Auto Workers reached an agreement with Ford that included wage hikes of 25%. Similar agreements with Stellantis and General Motors followed. Other unions won contract gains at large employers such as UPS and Hollywood TV and film studios. Then there was the much-celebrated UAW victory in a representa­tion election at Volkswagen in Tennessee and progress made at some Starbucks stores.

All the same, talk of a union renaissanc­e might be much ado about nothing. Union membership as a share of wage and salary workers has declined steadily from 28.3% in

1967 to an all-time low of 10% in 2023. Although the absolute number of union workers has recently risen, it hasn’t kept up with the growth of the total number of American workers.

National Review’s Dominic Pino has been following unions comprehens­ively. He never forgets to report wins and their losses. For instance, workers at a unionized Nissan facility in Somerset, New Jersey, are in the process of decertifyi­ng from the UAW.

These events are in line with the overall trend for UAW, Pino notes, as “membership declined last year to 370,000. It was nearly 400,000 in 2020, and it peaked at 1.5 million in 1970.” To be fair to the labor movement, part of this decline could be because UAW bosses have been pretty corrupt, with two past presidents convicted for embezzleme­nt.

It could also be that unions aren’t so much about fighting for the cause of blue-collar workers as they used to be. Indeed, 49% of union members worked for the government in 2023. Thirty-three percent of public-sector employees are in unions, as opposed to just 6% of the private sector. In the case of UAW, about 100,000 members work in higher education, including graduate student workers statistica­lly likely to go on to non-blue-collar jobs.

I believe public-sector unions shouldn’t exist. Taxpayers — the ones paying the bills — are not adequately represente­d at the negotiatin­g table. In fact, with their political donations, public-sector unions help decide who sits on the other end of that table.

By contrast, private unions have every right to exist, but this doesn’t mean they’re a good thing on net for workers. A September 2023 National Bureau of Economic Research paper looked at what a unionized workforce does to incentives and investment. While unionized plants pay higher wages and benefits than do nonunioniz­ed ones, they also “experience higher rates of closure, reduced investment, and slower employment growth.” In other words, your unionized job might pay more, as long as it doesn’t go away — and good luck finding another like it. The result holds also for partially unionized plants.

Introducin­g more competitio­n to the private-sector union business model could help. For that, my colleague Liya Palagashvi­li suggests ending the exclusive-representa­tion clause that “provides government-granted monopoly status to a union supported by 51% of an employer’s workers, giving it the sole authority to negotiate. This means that if some workers want a different union -- for example a newer one that might raise the bar in terms of what it can offer — they are out of luck.” Today, these workers aren’t allowed to engage in any negotiatio­ns with their employers, and they still have to pay the original union’s fees.

The bottom line is that unions aren’t really going through a renaissanc­e. All things considered, their failure is most workers’ gain.

 ?? ?? Veronique de Rugy
Veronique de Rugy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States