East Bay Times

Europe feels U.S.-China squeeze

Competitio­n heats up between two nations on technology front

- By Steven Erlanger and Adam Satariano

BRUSSELS >> Lacking a powerful technology sector of its own, the Europe Union has instead tried to carve out a space in the digital economy as the world’s regulatory superpower, leading the charge on privacy rights and data protection by leveraging its enormous single market against Goliaths like Google and Facebook.

But a number of recent examples have made it clear that for Europe, increasing­ly, that is not enough. The rapid pace of technologi­cal change — including artificial intelligen­ce and facial recognitio­n — is mingling ever more with national security concerns that European leaders have been slow to grasp and respond to, analysts say.

As global technology shapes up into a battlegrou­nd between China and the United States, Europe is finding it harder to set the rules of the road while others in Beijing and Washington are in the driver’s seat.

“Europe needs to get its act together,” said Marietje Schaake, internatio­nal policy director at the Cyber Policy Center of Stanford University and a former member of the European Parliament. “I worry the tempo is too slow for the pace at which changes are forthcomin­g.”

The most recent example is TikTok, the wildly popular Chinese short video app, which the Trump administra­tion has challenged by using many of the same national security arguments it employed against Huawei, the Chinese telecommun­ications giant, and its bid to become the globe’s dominant 5G provider.

Time and again, such disputes have left European leaders, regulators and industries squeezed between Beijing and Washington, risking retaliatio­n against carmakers, financial services firms or agricultur­e companies if they choose one side over the other.

In response, European leaders have belatedly embarked on a generation­al project toward “digital sovereignt­y,” mixing tougher rules against foreign tech companies with efforts to boost local innovation.

Margrethe Vestager, the European Commission vice president in charge of digital issues, has called it a “new phase” for technology policy in the region.

But those policies will take years to shift the balance meaningful­ly in Europe’s favor, analysts say, and many question whether they are really enough to close the technology gap with the United States and China.

One reason Brussels risks falling behind is that security remains the responsibi­lity of individual member nations, not one ceded to the European Union, Schaake said.

“TikTok confronts Europe with the weaknesses of its digital and national security policies,” she said. “Europe is naive about certain of the technologi­es coming from China and the United States, and just says that anyone doing business in Europe has to respect our rights and regulation­s.”

After months of debate, some European leaders are coming

around to views closer to those held in Washington, where President Donald Trump has moved to try to force the sale of TikTok’s U.S. operations to an American company, charging that the company’s Chinese ties present a national security threat.

It has used the same argument against Huawei, the telecommun­ications giant, though both companies deny any explicit link to the Chinese government.

In Europe, the U.S. point of view on Huawei, backed by the threat of secondary sanctions, has gained ground, most recently in Britain, where a ban was adopted in July.

But most Europeans mostly still see TikTok not as a security threat, but as a risk to privacy. Even if the White House-orchestrat­ed TikTok sale goes through, the European operations

will remain under the ownership of the Chinese parent company, ByteDance.

Gerard de Graaf, director for the digital single market for the European Commission, said that the European Union needed “a lot more cooperatio­n among member states on the issue of security.”

Europe has no major social media platforms, he conceded in a seminar at Bruegel, a Brussels research institutio­n, but is doing well in financial technology, robotics and 5G. “It’s not that the EU is way behind everyone else,” he said, “but we have challenges.”

But Francesca Bria, chair of the Italian National Innovation Fund, argued that Europe risked being squashed between the Chinese state model which is represente­d by Huawei, WeChat, Alibaba, Tencent and TikTok, with their state subsidies and the “big company, big tech surveillan­ce” of the American giants.

“If we fail to regain digital

sovereignt­y,” she said, “we risk becoming a colony caught between the U.S. and China,” with risks to democracy.

American tech shares alone are more valuable than the whole European stock market, Bria said. “Europe needs to remain relevant as a global economic power, not just a regulatory power,” she said.

The weaknesses are stark. The world’s most popular smartphone­s are made in China, South Korea and the United States. The biggest social media and online shopping platforms come from American and Chinese companies, as do the largest providers of cloud computing and artificial intelligen­ce services.

Europe has been missing from the list of the world’s most influentia­l technology companies since the fall of Nokia about a decade ago. For reasons including lack of venture capital, language barriers and a cultural aversion to risk, European companies have struggled

to match the entreprene­urial pace in a technology industry now dominated by mobile devices, internet services and online communicat­ion tools.

Europe has attempted to influence the digital economy through regulation, adopting tough data protection rules and aggressive­ly enforcing antitrust laws.

But European leaders are realizing the limits of those efforts, particular­ly as its citizens depend on Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google in the absence of European alternativ­es. The biggest European technology company is Germany’s SAP, a business software provider that competes with American companies like Microsoft and Oracle.

Along with privacy and security issues, TikTok also raises questions about disinforma­tion and about censorship exercised by the company on issues of sensitivit­y to China. The European Data Protection Board said in June that it

would set up a task force to assess TikTok’s activities across the bloc.

But it is not clear what European agency would take the lead, especially since TikTok in July shifted data protection functions to Dublin. That might give the Irish Data Protection Commission oversight of the company when it comes to privacy issues. But the agency has faced criticism in the past for not being more aggressive.

Noah Barkin, a senior visiting fellow at the German Marshall Fund, said Europe’s lack of influence ultimately stemmed from its dearth of influentia­l tech businesses. Europe will face these difficulti­es for years as China and the United States battle for tech supremacy.

“Europe hasn’t developed its own global digital companies to compete with the big U.S. and Chinese firms, and ultimately that’s what digital sovereignt­y is all about,” Barkin said. “It can’t just be a regulator.”

 ?? SUZIE HOWELL — THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? In Europe, the U.S. point of view on Huawei, backed by the threat of secondary sanctions, has gained ground, most recently in Britain.
SUZIE HOWELL — THE NEW YORK TIMES In Europe, the U.S. point of view on Huawei, backed by the threat of secondary sanctions, has gained ground, most recently in Britain.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States