East Bay Times

‘Discarded’ ballots in Pennsylvan­ia fuel campaign outrage

-

HARRISBURG, PA. >> The news release from a U. S. attorney in Pennsylvan­ia was provocativ­e: Nine mailed-in military ballots had been “discarded” by the local election office in a swing county of one of the most important presidenti­al battlegrou­nd states. All of them were marked for President Donald Trump, it said. Then came another news release with key details changed but still little explanatio­n of what had happened and whether investigat­ors believed a criminal act had occurred.

Despite the informatio­n vacuum, the White House press secretary told reporters “ballots for the president” had been “cast aside.” The Trump campaign’s rapid response arm pushed out the release from Trump’s own Justice Department under the headline “Democrats are trying to steal the election” — ignoring the fact that the local government, Luzerne County, is controlled by Republican­s. Conservati­ve voices used the news release as rocket fuel to amplify the investigat­ion on social media.

By Friday, more details had emerged in the Pennsylvan­ia case. The U.S. attorney’s office in Pennsylvan­ia notified senior officials at Justice Department headquarte­rs earlier this week about a small number of ballots that were found to be discarded, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press. Attorney General William Barr told Trump that the Justice Department was going to look into the matter before the department publicly confirmed the investigat­ion, the person said. The U.S. attorney’s office had received inquiries from local reporters about the ballots, the person said, and released the statement, which included specific details about the ballots, after Trump revealed the existence of the investigat­ion in an interview with Fox News Radio. The person could not discuss the investigat­ion publicly and spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity.

The Justice Department is permitted to advise the White House of pending investigat­ions or cases, but according to a memo dictating the scope of such contacts, that notificati­on is to be made “when — but only when — it is important for the performanc­e of the President’s duties and appropriat­e from a law enforcemen­t perspectiv­e.”

“This is clear politiciza­tion of the Justice Department’s work in the middle of an active general election,” said Kristen Clarke, executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. “It seemed like a thinly veiled attempt to breathe life into President Trump’s false claims about mail ballot fraud.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States