East Bay Times

Bills call for steps toward universal preschool across California

Advocates say such a system would help working-class families and their childen

- By Karen D'Souza EdSource

Long a goal of early childhood advocates, universal preschool has come a step closer to becoming reality.

A ssemblyma n Kev in McCarty, D- Sacramento, a veteran advocate for early education, and other legislator­s last week proposed a sweeping suite of bills to help reform the state’s early childhood system. The bills seek to expand transition­al kindergart­en to all 4- year- olds, make child care more affordable by creating a sliding scale for family fees, increase reimbursem­ent rates for preschool teachers and bar expulsions and suspension­s in preschool.

McCarty, who has championed universal preschool and other reforms for many years, stressed that this was an initial rollout and that more specifics regarding implementa­tion and funding would follow over time.

“This education package aims to lift up working families and our kids throughout California. We all know that early education matters for kindergart­en readiness, to make sure our kids are ready to thrive when they enter a public school system, and for moms trying to go to work or go to school themselves,” sa id McCa r t y, chairman of the Assembly Budget Subcommitt­ee on Education Finance, during a news conference on the legislatio­n. “We see it crystal clear during COVID-19 how much early education and child care impacts our economy.”

The bill package, which helps pave the way for Gov. Gavin Newsom’s recently released 10-year early education road map, the Master Plan for Early Learning and Care, was lauded by those concerned with early childhood education and care in California, a state with almost 3 million children under 5.

“It ’ s clea r t hat our youngest children need more support now than ever,” said Patricia Lozano, executive director of Early Edge California, an education nonprofit that is co- sponsoring part of the legislatio­n. “We want to be able to serve all the kids who need these services the most.”

These wide-ranging reform initiative­s come in response to long- standing concerns that of all the systems of education, early education has been the most inconsiste­nt and inaccessib­le to many of California’s low- income children, experts say. It also speaks to a growing understand­ing that the early years are critical to brain developmen­t, forming the foundation for lifelong academic and career success.

“There’s no doubt that early childhood education providers and families statewide need immediate help, so it’s critical that California takes steps both to stabilize the fragile field, expand services for families,” said Ted Lempert, president of Children Now, “and discontinu­e policies that perpetuate and exacerbate inequities and leave us behind the nation as other states continue to move ahead with real supports for young children.”

More specifics are called for, childhood advocates say, to determine how much impact the policies will have.

“The Devil will be in the details,” agreed Khieem Jackson, founder of Black Men for Educationa­l Equity, an advocacy group. “However, we are pleased to see Assembly members McCarty and (Blanca) Rubio’s commitment to bolstering equity by working to eliminate bias and inequitabl­e practices within the early learning and care system. These policy proposals have the potential to benefit millions of children.”

Assembly Bill 22, the expansion of transition­al kindergart­en to all 4-yearolds, which legislator­s say would largely be paid for through Propositio­n 98, which provides funding for K-12 education, is at the core of this bill package. However, some advocates maintain that there is not enough clarity yet on how the programs will be paid for.

“We really appreciate the leadership the Legislatur­e is taking on early care and education — many impor tant issues are tackled in this package of bills,” Lempert said. “But we need to ensure that we’re pairing these key ideas with additional, new investment­s, not investment­s that come at the expense of other kids’ services. If kids are truly prioritize­d in California, this state can afford both significan­t additional investment­s in early ed and K-12.”

Expanding transition­al kindergart­en, which is designed to be a bridge between preschool and kindergart­en, will ensure that there is an even playing field for all children, advocates say, as they enter kindergart­en.

“It makes no sense that only one- quarter of 4-yearolds are provided access to an additional year of kindergar ten,” said Kerr y Woods, chair of the political action group for the California School Employees Associatio­n. “Expanding transition­al kindergart­en to all California’s 4 - year- olds is the right thing to do, and we should do it now, as study after study shows that providing quality early education for our children prepares them for future educationa­l and personal success.”

Currently, transition­al kindergart­en is only available to 4- year- olds who turn 5 between Sept. 2 and Dec. 2, a short window.

“We know that transition­al kindergart­en works. It’s been around for 10 years now in California, and research shows that it makes a tremendous difference for all students, of all income levels, who have been through transition­al kindergart­en,” McCarty said. “We’ve had essentiall­y a pilot project for 10 years.”

Another critical part of the package is Assembly Bill 92, which would create a sliding scale for family fees for child care. The annual cost of care for an infant in a licensed child care center in California last year was more than $15,000, for instance, according to the California Budget and Policy Center.

“A ny legislatio­n that will boost resources for families with low incomes is a step in the right direction,” said Kristin Schumacher, senior policy analyst for the California Budget and Policy Center, a nonprofit research organizati­on. “Many of these families have very low incomes, and any relief in the way of fees will allow them to direct their resources to other high- ticket items like rent, transporta­tion, or even supplies for the children like formula and diapers.”

The steep cost of child care has only worsened dur in g t he pa ndemic , as almost 6,000 family child care providers have been forced to close their doors this year, according to Child Care Providers United, a union coalition.

“This would ease the burden on families,” said A ssembly woman Eloise Reyes, D- San Bernardino. “On a limited income, many families struggle to afford the cost of child care while providing for basic needs such as food and housing.”

Raising wages for preschool teachers and other caregivers is also a key part of addressing the inequities of the child care system, experts say.

“The fact is our caregivers and teachers are woefully underpaid,” said Scott Moore, head of Kidango, a nonprofit organizati­on that runs many Bay Area child care centers. “We need to raise rates so that it is possible to earn a profession­al wage.”

Other elements of the reform package include Senate Bill 50, sponsored by Sen. Monique Limon, D- Santa Barbara, which intends to create a more streamline­d framework of programs for children from birth to age 6, and a bill that would make kindergart­en mandatory.

Another key bill would bar expulsions and suspension­s in subsidized early learning programs. C hild ren in preschool programs are expelled at a much higher rate than students in K-12, said Assemblywo­man Blanca Rubio, D-Baldwin Park, a former school teacher, who is co- sponsoring the bill.

Equity is at the core of the issue. African American children, for example, are prone to receive harsher discipline than other students who display the same behavior, studies show.

“Children of color, of course, are disproport­ionately affected,” Rubio said. “We must address all of these injustices. If children are not getting the support they need, the programs are futile.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States