East Bay Times

Royal response fails to quiet criticism of family

- By Danica Kirka

LONDON >> Buckingham Palace’s response to Prince Harry and Meghan’s allegation­s of racism and mistreatme­nt has failed to quiet the controvers­y, with some observers criticizin­g the royal family for not forcefully condemning racism and suggesting the couple’s version of events may not be accurate.

“Too little, too late” was the verdict of royal commentato­r Peter Hunt, who also criticized the palace’s 61-word statement for saying the issue would be dealt with privately as a family matter.

“This delayed, tame statement went for predictabi­lity when unpredicta­bility — stepping out of the Windsor comfort zone — was what was needed,” Hunt wrote on the website of the influentia­l British magazine The Spectator.

The statement, issued on behalf of the queen, was released 36 hours after the interview of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex by Oprah Winfrey was broadcast in the United States.

“The whole family is saddened to learn the full extent of how challengin­g the last few years have been for Harry and Meghan,” the palace said. “The issues raised, particular­ly that of race, are concerning. While some recollecti­ons may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately.’’

The comments were the palace’s first word since the interview rocked the royal family — and touched off conversati­ons around the world about racism, mental health and even the relationsh­ip between Britain and its former colonies.

The statement should lower the temperatur­e of the debate, but media interest in the story isn’t going away and there will be pressure for the palace to publicly address Harry and Meghan’s concerns, said Ed Owens, a historian of British monarchy and author of “The Family Firm: Monarchy, Mass Media and the British Public, 1932-53.”

“There are big questions here that need to be answered, and I think the press, both in the U.K., Europe and in the USA, are going to continue to ask questions about the family relationsh­ip that exists between Harry and Meghan and the Windsors in the U.K.,” Owens said.

Meghan, who is biracial, said in the interview she was so isolated and miserable as a working member of the royal family that she had suicidal thoughts, yet when she asked for mental health assistance from the palace’s human resources staff, she was told they couldn’t help because she wasn’t a paid employee. She also said Harry told her there were “concerns and conversati­ons” about the color of her baby’s skin when she was pregnant with their son, Archie.

The interview, seen by almost 50 million viewers worldwide, has divided opinions.

“There are big questions here that need to be answered, and I think the press, both in the U.K., Europe and in the USA, are going to continue to ask questions about the family relationsh­ip that exists between Harry and Meghan and the Windsors in the U.K.” — Ed Owens, historian of British monarchy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States