East Bay Times

Attorneys probe jurors’ views about police

-

Attorneys in the trial of a former Minneapoli­s police officer charged in George Floyd’s death questioned potential jurors Wednesday about their attitudes toward police, trying to determine whether they’re more inclined to believe testimony from law enforcemen­t over evidence from other witnesses to the fatal confrontat­ion.

Judge Peter Cahill seated two more jurors to go with the three picked Tuesday for Derek Chauvin’s trial on second-degree murder and manslaught­er charges. It’s been a grinding process in which attorneys ask prospectiv­e jurors one by one whether they could keep an open mind, what they think of the criminal justice system and racial justice issues, how they resolve conflicts and more.

In a separate developmen­t, the Minnesota Supreme Court declined to hear Chauvin’s appeal to block a third-degree murder charge from being reinstated. At issue is whether the conviction of another former Minneapoli­s police officer in the killing of an Australian woman establishe­d a precedent for prosecutor­s to restore a third-degree murder count that the trial judge dismissed earlier. The Minnesota Court of Appeals last week said it settled the law with its ruling last month affirming the conviction of Mohamed Noor in the 2017 shooting death of Justine Ruszczyk Damond.

The new decision from the state’s highest court left open the possibilit­y that Cahill could add the charge back. It also ended, at least for now, the prospect of a lengthy delay that could have resulted from it taking up the case. The state had asked the Court of Appeals to halt the trial pending resolution of the matter, and that court later Wednesday denied that request as moot.

Legal experts say giving the jury another option for convicting Chauvin of murder raises the chance of a conviction.

Cahill noted the ruling during a break and told the prosecutio­n and defense that they’ll discuss next steps this morning before jury selection begins.

The first juror picked Wednesday, a man who works in sales management and grew up in a mostly White part of central Minnesota, acknowledg­ed saying on his written questionna­ire that he had a “very favorable” opinion of the Black Lives Matter movement and a “somewhat unfavorabl­e” impression of the Blue Lives Matter countermov­ement in favor of police, yet “somewhat agreed” that police don’t get the respect they deserve.

He said he agrees that there are bad police officers.

 ?? COUrT Tu uIA AP, POOL ?? Judge Peter Cahill
COUrT Tu uIA AP, POOL Judge Peter Cahill

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States