East Bay Times

Water district allots $23.2M for bridge pipeline

Richmond mayor, others oppose potential noise, congestion from project

- By Will Houston

The Marin Municipal Water District has allocated up to $23.2 million to buy equipment for a proposed emergency supply pipeline across the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge.

The investment, approved by the district board Tuesday, is the largest the agency has made since proposing the idea earlier this year.

The 8-mile pipeline, estimated to cost up to $90 million, is the district’s main backup plan should it deplete its main reservoir supplies next summer in the event of another dry winter.

“We are doing this project because this drought has shown us we are vulnerable — our district, our customers,” board member Monty Schmitt said Tuesday. “We are vulnerable to years of extreme dry conditions, the kinds of conditions that we know are going to become more of the norm.”

Several Richmond residents attended the meeting to voice strong opposition to the project. Their comments came a day after Richmond Mayor Tom Butt released a scathing newsletter criticizin­g the water district’s planning, claiming the pipeline water would be used to “preserve lush lawns” and listing the various impacts that residents would have to face. The effects would include the closure of a section of the San Francisco Bay Trail, months of constructi­on noise and traffic congestion on local streets and the westbound span of the bridge, Butt wrote.

“Richmond is expected to suffer the consequenc­es of poor planning and lack of water conservati­on by the 14th-richest county in America,” Butt wrote.

District staff said the pipeline

water would only be used for vital indoor uses to protect health and safety.

The district plans to use bond funds to buy 55,000 feet of steel pipe for $16.7 million; two large pump stations for $3.7 million; and two bolted steel tanks for $1.9 million that each can hold 1 million gallons of water. The equipment would be used to bring purchased Sacramento Valley water over the bridge from Richmond into Marin County.

The purchase is not a final decision on whether the pipeline actually will get built. However, district staff said buying the materials now ensures they will be manufactur­ed in time should constructi­on proceed in March.

A vote on an estimated $40 million constructi­on contract is expected to occur in January.

Board member Larry Bragman said that though he is not a supporter of the pipeline in general, the potential of depleting the water supply warrants action.

“Unless we act, we are taking responsibi­lity for worsening or potentiall­y creating health and safety risks,” Bragman said.

District forecasts show it could deplete its main reservoir supplies as soon as July or August should next winter be as dry as the last. Meteorolog­ists predict that La Niña weather patterns this winter could mean another dry winter.

The Marin County district differs from its counterpar­ts in the Bay Area in that it relies primarily on seven local reservoirs in the Mount Tamalpais watershed for 75% of its water supply and is not connected to state and federal water systems. The district’s reservoirs are now less than a third full and will require significan­t amounts of rain this winter to overcome the water shortage emergency.

Using the aid of water districts such as East Bay Municipal Utility District and the Contra Costa Water District, the purchased water would travel more than 100 miles through aqueducts, reservoirs, treatment facilities and possibly the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta before arriving in Richmond and being pumped over the bridge.

The district built a similar pipeline during the drought of 1977, the last time it faced running out of local supplies.

Though the pipeline could bring in about 13.5 million gallons per day, the East Bay Municipal Utility District said it would only reliably be able to pump in 8 million gallons per day, or 60% of capacity, in order not to affect water pressure for its Point Richmond ratepayers.

The board’s decision to begin buying constructi­on materials now comes with risk because the sales are nonrefunda­ble, according to district staff. So if this winter brings a deluge of rain that knocks the agency out of its water shortage, the district could be stuck with miles of pipe and other materials.

However, staffers said the pumping stations, water tanks and up to 50% of the pipe can be put to other uses such as pipe replacemen­t projects and emergency response.

Several Richmond residents attending the board meeting opposed the pipeline. The residents said the district has failed to conduct outreach to neighborho­ods that will now have to host pumping stations, endure traffic and noise impacts from constructi­on and see local streets and trails dug up in order to install the piping.

“You want a pumping station in your neighborho­od? No, you don’t,” Point Richmond resident Jeff Ritterman told the board.

They also argued that the district and Marin County residents have not done enough to conserve water. The district set a conservati­on goal of 40% in April, but residents reached peak conservati­on of 30% in August. Last week, conservati­on was 24% compared with average water use from 2018 through 2020.

Richmond resident Lisa Johnson said her city already has to endure increased traffic and pollution after a third eastbound lane was opened on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge and now faces the potential of having a pump station placed in a residentia­l neighborho­od.

“Please stop treating us as second-class citizens,” Johnson told the board.

Cynthia Koehler, president of the water district board, apologized for not conducting enough outreach to residents and called on staffers to begin setting meetings.

Ben Horenstein, the district’s general manager, said the staff will “explore every opportunit­y” to move the piping placement and pumping station away from residentia­l areas.

Environmen­talists such as Fairfax residents Frank Egger, director of the North Coast Rivers Alliance, and Chance Cutrano, programs director at the Resource Renewal Institute, raised concerns about the district’s claiming the pipeline to be exempt from state environmen­tal review because it is an emergency project. They said the project could put more strain on the already high water demands from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, which they said could exacerbate impacts to endangered species such as delta smelt.

In addition to the constructi­on materials, the board also voted unanimousl­y Tuesday to enter into an agreement with the Contra Costa Water District to aid Marin in water purchases and the use of its facilities to bring the water to Marin. The Marin Municipal Water District estimates that the water purchases and the use of Contra Costa’s water system could cost $8 million to $9 million.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States