East Bay Times

House moves toward OK of social, climate bill

- By Alan Fram

WASHINGTON >> A divided House moved toward passage Thursday of Democrats’ expansive social and environmen­t bill as new cost estimates from Congress’ top fiscal analyst suggested that moderate lawmakers’ spending and deficit worries would be calmed, moving President Joe Biden closer to a badly needed victory.

Final debate on the long-delayed legislatio­n came after the nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Budget Office said the bill would worsen federal deficits by $160 billion over the coming decade. It also recalculat­ed the measure’s 10-year price tag at $1.68 trillion, though that figure wasn’t directly comparable to a $1.85 trillion figure Democrats have been using.

House approval would ship the legislatio­n to the Senate and end — though just for now — months of battling between Democrats’ progressiv­es and moderates over its costs and policies. While significan­t Senate changes are likely due to cost-cutting demands by moderate Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., House passage would edge Biden closer to winning more of his domestic priorities at a time when his public approval is faltering badly.

The 2,100-page bill’s initiative­s include bolstering child care assistance, creating free preschool, curbing seniors’ prescripti­on drug costs and beefing up efforts to slow climate change.

“Too many Americans are just barely getting by in our economy,” said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md. “And we simply can’t go back to the way things were before the pandemic.”

An initial batch of key figures released by the nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Budget Office showed that its projection­s were aligning closely with earlier estimates from the White House. That included tax credits to spur clean energy developmen­t, bolstered child care assistance and extended tax breaks for millions of families with children, lowerearni­ng workers and people buying private health insurance.

The measure would provide $109 billion to create free preschool for 3- and 4-year-olds. There were large sums for home health care for seniors, new Medicare coverage for hearing and a new requiremen­t for four weeks of paid family leave. The family leave program, however, was expected to be removed in the Senate.

In one major but expected difference, CBO estimated that by spending $80 billion to beef up IRS tax enforcemen­t, the agency would collect $207 billion in new revenue over the coming decade. That meant net savings of $127 billion, well below the White

House’s more optimistic $400 billion estimate.

In a scorekeepi­ng quirk, CBO formally estimated that the legislatio­n would drive up federal budget deficits by $367 billion over the coming decade. The agency’s budget guidelines technicall­y require it to not count IRS savings when measuring a bill’s deficit impact. But it acknowledg­ed that the measure’s true impact would produce added shortfalls of the lower figure — $160 billion — when counting added revenue the IRS would collect.

Biden and other Democratic leaders have said the measure would pay for itself, largely through tax increases on the wealthy, big corporatio­ns and companies doing business abroad. Republican­s said the legislatio­n would damage an economy already racked by inflation, give tax breaks to some wealthy taxpayers and make government bigger and more intrusive. Drawing frequent GOP attacks was a provision boosting the limit on state and local taxes that people can deduct from federal taxes, which disproport­ionately helps top earners from high-tax coastal states.

Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., spoke for over two hours against the package and recited problems the country has faced under Biden, including inflation, large numbers of immigrants crossing the Southwest border and the chaotic U.S. withdrawal from Afghanista­n. “Yeah, I want to go back,” he said in mocking reference to the “Build Back Better” name Biden uses for the legislatio­n.

Democrats booed as he spoke, prompting McCarthy to glare and say: “It’s OK. I’m here all night.”

Two weeks after centrists’ objections forced Democrats to delay the measure, the party’s divisions seemed all but resolved, for now.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States