East Bay Times

What might Trump decide after midterms?

- By Victor Davis Hanson Victor Davis Hanson is a syndicated columnist. © 2022 Tribune Content Agency.

Former President Donald Trump has signaled he will announce his presidenti­al intentions after the November midterm elections. Yet his record of endorsemen­ts is quite mixed.

The disaster that is the Biden administra­tion has been a godsend for Trump. Had President Joe Biden simply plagiarize­d the successful Trump agenda, there would have followed no border disaster, no energy crisis, no hyperinfla­tion and no disastrous flight from Afghanista­n.

Of course, serious people knew from the start that was utterly impossible. A cognitivel­y challenged Biden was a captive of ideologues. Thus, he was bound to pursue an extremist agenda that could only end as it now has — in disaster and record low polls.

Still, how ironic that the Biden catastroph­e revived a Trump candidacy.

So, will Trump run? Some logic might dictate that Trump not try a second campaign. He would be 79. The recent record of doddering septuagena­rian and octogenari­an politician­s — Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein — has warned Americans that one's late 70s certainly are not, as the baby boomer generation may try to hype, the “new 50s.”

In addition, Trump's old and new business ventures would take further and greater hits.

His family would again be targeted and unfairly maligned.

An otherwise nihilist progressiv­e and media agenda would reawaken solely to destroy Trump.

The Trump MAGA legacy is now largely institutio­nalized.

The Trump record itself between 2017 and 2021 would be assessed more positively.

On the other hand, in 2016 the Republican field was also hailed as a dream team. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker was acclaimed as the handson pro who ran a purple state, battling successful­ly public-employee unions and left-wing monied special interests.

We know how that field ended.

Trump supporters would counter that a wiser Trump would hit the ground running.

The Trump base would add that a non-Trump Trump candidate would never endure, much less brawl against, left-wing madness. They would claim that avoiding culde-sac spats while doubling down on the Trump agenda sounds nice — in the fashion that, theoretica­lly, there could be sunshine without the sun.

In the end, none of the above considerat­ions will likely matter.

Instead, the outcome of the midterms will tell a lot. A clear but not overwhelmi­ng Republican win will likely discourage Trump and empower his critics.

But a historic blowout will spur Trump. In the end, even if most Republican­s would prefer he not run, they will likely vote for him over the hard-left alternativ­e.

As for the Democratic landscape, it will not be the case that Biden may choose to run. He will not run because the decision will not be his.

Even if he manages to last another two years in office, Democratic grandees know his cognitive faculties are eroding rapidly. They read polls and know what his non compos mentis optics have done to their party.

These same interests are just as terrified of Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Those two believe that the Biden disaster was not due to his embrace of hard socialism, but to his insufficie­nt embrace of socialism.

Given the alternativ­es, all sorts of names will arise, from Mike Bloomberg-like billionair­es and Michelle Obama to most of those dismal 2020 primary retreads.

In the end, a Republican nominee can win who convincing­ly promises a secure border, a pathway to a balanced budget, energy independen­ce, a crackdown on crime, and a strong, nonpolitic­al military with a commitment to missile defense.

And the nominee would have to do all that neither with gratuitous insults nor playing by wishy-washy Marquess of Queensberr­y rules against those whose toxic agendas here and abroad have created the present disaster.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States