East Bay Times

`Forever chemicals' widespread in wildlife, research indicates

- By Catrin Einhorn

Polar bears in the Arctic and plankton in the Pacific. Cardinals in Atlanta and crocodiles in South Africa.

While concern about PFAS compounds, also known as “forever chemicals” because they break down very slowly, has largely focused on people, the pollutants have also been detected in wildlife. Now, a review of research made public Wednesday by the Environmen­tal Working Group, a nonprofit advocacy organizati­on that focuses on environmen­tal safety, shows PFAS turning up in hundreds of wild animal species around the world.

In people, some of these chemicals are linked to cancers, developmen­tal issues, reduced immune function, hormonal interferen­ce and heightened cholestero­l. Last year, the Environmen­tal Protection Agency found there was virtually no safe level in humans for two of the most widely used PFAS chemicals and proposed designatin­g them as hazardous.

To get a sense of contaminat­ion in wildlife, researcher­s at the Environmen­tal Working Group reviewed more than a hundred studies and created a map from their survey.

“We were like, `Holy smokes, this is shocking,' ” said David Andrews, a senior scientist at the organizati­on who worked on the review, recalling his team's surprise at the sheer number and spread of studies documentin­g contaminat­ion.

With many wild animal and plant species staggering under a worsening biodiversi­ty crisis driven by habitat loss, hunting and fishing, climate change and other pressures, scientists say they are increasing­ly worried about the added burden of PFAS contaminat­ion.

“These chemicals are likely serving as an additional stressor,” Andrews said.

Scientists are only beginning to understand that dynamic. One study found that concentrat­ions of PFAS in endangered sea turtles correlated with reduced ability to hatch. Others have found levels in dolphins that compare to those in workers who have been occupation­ally exposed.

Most Americans have PFAS in their blood, according to the federal government. The chemicals are found in a variety of consumer products, including nonstick cookware, waterproof clothes and stain-resistant fabrics. They are being phased out in food packaging.

Formally called perfluoroa­lkyl and polyfluoro­alkyl substances, the chemicals are created by fusing fluorine and carbon atoms to create a compound that doesn't exist naturally. Because many of these chemicals break down very slowly, they tend to accumulate up the food chain.

Manufactur­ers counter that not all PFAS compounds are the same.

“It is not scientific­ally accurate or appropriat­e to group this vast family of solid, liquid and gaseous substances into a one-size-fits-all class,” said Tom Flanagin, a spokespers­on for the American Chemistry Council.

Researcher­s working in the field already knew them to be widespread in wildlife.

“PFAS are everywhere and in most animals surveyed,” said Rainer Lohmann, a professor of oceanograp­hy at the University of Rhode Island who focuses on PFAS contaminat­ion and was not involved in the Environmen­tal Working Group's review. “But collecting that informatio­n and putting it together is a huge effort. And I am not sure the general public is fully aware how thoroughly these chemicals have penetrated the environmen­t.”

Lohmann noted that areas on the map that seem to have less contaminat­ion — Africa, South America and much of Asia — probably just appear that way because of a lack of studies conducted in those places.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States