East Bay Times

Supreme Court hasn't always been friendly in Trump cases

- By Adam Liptak

“I'm not happy with the Supreme Court,” President Donald Trump said on Jan. 6, 2021. “They love to rule against me.”

His assessment of the court, in a speech delivered outside the White House urging his supporters to march on the Capitol, had a substantia­l element of truth in it.

Other parts of the speech were laced with fury and lies, and the Colorado Supreme Court cited some of those passages Tuesday as evidence that Trump has engaged in insurrecti­on and was ineligible to hold office again.

But Trump's reflection­s on the U.S. Supreme Court in the speech, freighted with grievance and accusation­s of disloyalty, captured not only his perspectiv­e but also an inescapabl­e reality. A fundamenta­lly conservati­ve court, with a six-justice majority of Republican appointees that includes three named by Trump himself, has not been particular­ly receptive to his arguments.

Indeed, the Trump administra­tion had the worst Supreme Court record of any since at least the Roosevelt administra­tion, according to data developed by Lee Epstein and Rebecca L. Brown, law professors at the University of Southern California, for an article in Presidenti­al Studies Quarterly.

Now another series of Trump cases are at the court or on its threshold: one on whether he enjoys absolute immunity from prosecutio­n; another on the viability of a central charge in the federal election-interferen­ce case; and the third, from Colorado, on whether he was banned from another term under the 14th Amendment.

The cases pose distinct legal questions, but earlier decisions suggest they could divide the court's conservati­ve wing along a surprising fault line: Trump's appointees have been less likely to vote for him in some politicall­y charged cases than Justice Clarence Thomas, who was appointed by President George H.W. Bush, and Justice Samuel Alito Jr., who was appointed by President George W. Bush.

In his speech at the Ellipse on Jan. 6, Trump spoke ruefully about his three appointees: Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, suggesting that they had betrayed him to establish their independen­ce.

“I picked three people,” he said. “I fought like hell for them.”

Trump said his nominees had abandoned him, blaming his losses on the justices' eagerness to participat­e in Washington social life and to assert their independen­ce from the charge that “they're my puppets.”

He added, “And now the only way they can get out of that because they hate that it's not good in the social circuit. And the only way they get out is to rule against Trump. So let's rule against Trump. And they do that.”

 ?? PETE MAROVICH — THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Former President Donald Trump speaks to supporters on Jan. 6, 2021. The Trump administra­tion had the worst track record before the justices of any administra­tion since at least the 1930s, even though Trump appointed three of the justices.
PETE MAROVICH — THE NEW YORK TIMES Former President Donald Trump speaks to supporters on Jan. 6, 2021. The Trump administra­tion had the worst track record before the justices of any administra­tion since at least the 1930s, even though Trump appointed three of the justices.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States