East Bay Times

Is it still worth investing in SOLAR PANELS?

INDUSTRY EXPERTS WEIGH IN

- By Roxana Popescu

The arithmetic on new installati­ons has changed, but it rarely breaks even without a battery system

A little over a year ago, the California Public Utilities Commission overhauled the rules for rooftop solar installati­ons across the state. In its December 2022 decision, the commission added incentives for customers to pair solar with batteries, but the new rules also dramatical­ly reduced net energy metering, or NEM, compensati­on rates.

New panels can be a hefty investment, costing on average $2.8 per watt, including installati­on, according to the EnergySage quote comparison tool. “For a 5 (kilowatt-hour) installati­on, this comes out to about $14,004 before incentives, though prices range from $11,903 to $16,105. After the federal tax credit, the average price drops by 30%,” the site says.

NEM 2.0 was phased out in April, leaving the new NEM compensati­on rates — what solar customers receive when their rooftop systems generate more energy than they consume — as the only option for new solar installati­ons.

Given that today's export rates — the compensati­on to solar panel owners for

the excess electricit­y their panels export to the grid — are 75% lower under the new rules, the math on new installati­ons has changed.

The payoff point is later and now it's essential to add a battery, which adds more to the upfront cost. Tax incentives take off some of the edge. But other key incentives recently ended or are expected to sunset after this year.

Given all this, does it still make sense

to add solar?

Many homeowners say no. Solar installati­ons fell dramatical­ly in 2023.

“Utility interconne­ction request data shows that solar sales have fallen between 66% and 83% year-over-year following NEM 3.0,” pv magazine USA, a trade publicatio­n, reported in December. “What's more, there have been massive layoffs industrywi­de.”

 ?? MICHAEL GOULDING — SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP ?? Advocates for the solar industry argue for a gentle step-down period that preserves the current system as long as possible. The major utility companies argue that people without solar have been subsidizin­g the people with solar for years, to the tune of some $3 billion.
MICHAEL GOULDING — SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP Advocates for the solar industry argue for a gentle step-down period that preserves the current system as long as possible. The major utility companies argue that people without solar have been subsidizin­g the people with solar for years, to the tune of some $3 billion.
 ?? RACHEL BUJALSKI — THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? An Amy's Roofing & Solar employee installs panels on a house in Sebastopol on Jan. 5. A new policy in California has lowered the value of credits for some solar homeowners.
RACHEL BUJALSKI — THE NEW YORK TIMES An Amy's Roofing & Solar employee installs panels on a house in Sebastopol on Jan. 5. A new policy in California has lowered the value of credits for some solar homeowners.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States