East Bay Times

Dubai company's land deals in Africa raise fears about risks to Indigenous livelihood­s

- By Taiwo Adebayo

ABUJA, NIGERIA >> Matthew Walley's eyes sweep over the large forest that has sustained his Indigenous community in Liberia for generation­s. Even as the morning sun casts a golden hue over the canopy, a sense of unease lingers. Their use of the land is being threatened, and they have organized to resist the possibilit­y of losing their livelihood.

In the past year, the Liberian government has agreed to sell about 10% of the West African country's land — equivalent to 4,220 square miles — to Dubaibased company Blue Carbon to preserve forests that might otherwise be logged and used for farming, the primary livelihood for many communitie­s.

Blue Carbon, which did not respond to repeated emails and calls seeking comment, plans to make money from this conservati­on by selling carbon credits to polluters to offset their emissions as they burn fossil fuels. Some experts argue that the model offers little climate benefit, while activists label it “carbon colonialis­m.”

Activists say the government has no legal right over the land and that Liberian law acknowledg­es Indigenous land ownership. The government and Blue Carbon reached an agreement in March 2023 — months after the company's launch — without consulting local communitie­s, which are concerned about a lack of protection­s.

“There is no legal framework on carbon credits in Liberia, and so we don't have rules and regulation­s to fight for ourselves as a community,” said Walley, whose community, Neezuin, could see about 573 square kilometers signed away to Blue Carbon.

A raft of agreements between at least five African countries and Blue Carbon could give the company control over large swaths of land on the continent. In Kenya, Indigenous population­s already have been evicted to make way for other carbon credits projects, according to rights groups like Amnesty Internatio­nal and Survival Internatio­nal.

They have criticized the projects as “culturally destructiv­e,” lacking transparen­cy and threatenin­g the livelihood­s and food security of rural African population­s.

“Many such projects are associated with appalling human rights abuses against local communitie­s at the hands of park rangers,” said Simon Counsell, an independen­t researcher of conservati­on projects in Kenya, Congo, Cameroon and other countries.

“The majority had involved evictions, most were involved in conflict with local people, and almost none had ever sought or gained the landholder­s' consent,” said Counsell, former director of Rainforest Foundation UK, a nonprofit that supports both human rights and environmen­tal protection.

Africa contribute­s the least to greenhouse gas emissions, but its vast natural resources, such as forests, are crucial in the fight against climate change. Indigenous population­s traditiona­lly rely on forests for their livelihood­s, highlighti­ng the tension between climate goals and economic realities.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States