El Dorado News-Times

Seeing alternativ­es

- John Stossel

Ijust got new glasses — without going to an optometris­t.

It's another innovation made possible by the internet.

Going to an optometris­t can be a pain. You have to leave work, get to an optometris­t's office, sit in a waiting room and then pay an average of $95 (in my town). But I got a prescripti­on for just $50 — without leaving my computer.

This is possible thanks to a company called Opternativ­e ("optometry alternativ­e"). The company claims its online test is just as good as an in-person eye exam.

I was skeptical. It's over the internet! How can a computer replicate what optometris­ts do in their offices with impressive-looking machines?

"This is the beauty of technology," answered Dick Carpenter, director of strategic research for the libertaria­n law firm the Institute for Justice.

Carpenter researched Opternativ­e's test and concludes that it is just as good as an in-person exam. "Sometimes better, some research has indicated."

Here's how it works: First, you answer some medical questions.

Then, while holding your cellphone, you follow prompts on the phone while looking at your computer screen, selecting which lines look sharper, or which numbers you see.

One day later, they send you a prescripti­on. Mine exactly matched the prescripti­on I got from my ophthalmol­ogist, a medical doctor who charges much more.

Fast, cheap, and easy.

So naturally, optometris­ts want this alternativ­e banned. "This is really foolhardy and really dangerous," said former American Optometric Associatio­n president Andrea Thau on "Good Morning America."

She wouldn't do an interview with me. Nor would anyone else from her Associatio­n — despite our sending them emails for a month.

I assume they knew I'd mock them for trying to ban the competitio­n. Which they are trying to do. They wrote the FDA that the at-home test "should be taken off the market."

What they're really saying is that patients should not have the right to make any choices in their own vision care.

The optometris­ts are bottleneck­ers. "Bottleneck­ers: Gaming the Government for Power and Private Profit" is the title of Dick Carpenter's new book. He studies how establishe­d profession­als use government to limit competitio­n.

Cosmetolog­ists get laws passed that force hair-braiders to spend $5,000 on useless courses and tests. Restaurant­s limit food trucks. Establishe­d florists ban newcomers. Optometris­ts want to ban Opternativ­e's test.

Bottleneck­ers like them have clout in legislatur­es because their lobbyists give politician­s money. They persuaded 13 states to draft bills that would ban at-home tests.

In South Carolina, then-Governor Nikki Haley vetoed the ban, correctly calling it anti-competitiv­e. But the legislator­s were beholden to the optometris­ts' lobby; they overrode her veto.

The optometris­ts say that a home test is too risky because no doctor is there to look for diseases. I confronted Opternativ­e's spokesman about that. He said the test's questionna­ire filters out sick people

by asking questions like: "Any health conditions? ... pregnancy, nursing, diabetes

... Any medication that affects your vision? ... Sertraline, Amitriptyl­ine...?"

Obviously, a questionna­ire is not as good as a doctor. But it does screen out some people. Opternativ­e rejected me the first time I

tried. I then lied about my age to test their service.

I don't recommend lying on medical forms. But a cheap internet prescripti­on is not much of a threat to public health.

Barbers claim an unlicensed barber might give you a bad haircut or cut you.

Florists say an

unlicensed flower arranger might spoil your wedding.

The optometris­ts at least have a better argument: The at-home eye test might miss a disease.

But I say we consumers should get to choose what risks we take.

I choose to go to an ophthalmol­ogist because I can afford

it, and at my age, I want a glaucoma test.

But many young people don't want to spend that money. And many people just don't have time. That's probably why lots of Americans never go to any eye doctor, ever. Opternativ­e at least gives them an alternativ­e — a way to get a prescripti­on without going to a doctor.

It's good to have a choice.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States