El Dorado News-Times

Arkansas faces more fights over abortion limits

-

LITTLE ROCK (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to let Arkansas enforce a law that critics say effectivel­y bans abortion pills in the state is a setback for abortion rights supporters who have been fighting a wave of restrictio­ns in the predominan­tly Republican state. The court fight over that restrictio­n and others is far from over.

The nation's high court last week rejected an appeal from Planned Parenthood, which wanted justices to reverse an appeals court ruling and reinstate a lower court order that blocked the law from taking effect. The law says doctors who provide the abortion pills must hold a contract with another physician who has admitting privileges at a hospital and who would

agree to handle complicati­ons — and Planned Parenthood says it has been unable to find any able to do so.

The legal fight doesn't end, but the ruling means Arkansas can enforce the law for the time being. Planned Parenthood said it has started telling patients they couldn't access medication abortions because of the ruling and has asked for a new temporary restrainin­g order from the lower court. A federal judge plans to hold a hearing on that request Friday morning.

The courts have essentiall­y been a revolving door for legal fights over abortion limits in Arkansas since Republican­s took control of the state Legislatur­e six years ago. Here's where other cases over Arkansas' efforts to

ban or restrict the procedure stand:

4 ABORTION RESTRICTIO­NS

Arkansas is appealing a judge's 2017 decision to prevent the state from enforcing four new abortion restrictio­ns, including a ban on a common second trimester procedure and a fetal remains law that opponents say would effectivel­y require a partner's consent before a woman could get an abortion. The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Reproducti­ve Rights had sued over the restrictio­ns. U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker, the same judge who had blocked the abortion pill limits, issued a preliminar­y injunction against the abortion restrictio­ns days before they were set to

take effect. The measures blocked also include part of a law that would have banned abortions based solely on the fetus' sex and a requiremen­t that physicians performing abortions for patients under age 14 take certain steps to preserve embryonic or fetal tissue and notify police where the minor resides. Opponents of the restrictio­ns say they would make it nearly impossible for many women in the state to get an abortion.

ABORTION CLINICS

Attorneys for Planned Parenthood and another abortion clinic in Little Rock not affiliated with the group have asked a federal judge to strike down a law requiring the suspension or revocation of their licenses for any violation. The ACLU is

representi­ng Little Rock Family Planning Services in the lawsuit. U.S. District Judge James M. Moody Jr. didn't rule last year after a hearing on the clinics' challenge to the law, which the abortion providers say singles them out in an unconstitu­tional manner. The state already had the discretion to revoke or suspend the clinics' licenses on a case-by-case basis before the law was enacted. The abortion providers this year renewed their request for a ruling in the case after Moody scheduled a trial over the law for 2019.

MEDICAID DEFUNDING

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year upheld Arkansas' decision to block Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood over

videos secretly recorded by an anti-abortion group. The full 8th Circuit in November said it wouldn't reconsider a decision by a panel of its judges to vacate the preliminar­y injunction issued by Baker that prevented Arkansas from suspending Medicaid payments for services rendered to patients in the state. Planned Parenthood and the ACLU sued after Gov. Asa Hutchinson made the defunding decision in 2015. The case is now back before Baker after Planned Parenthood asked the judge earlier this year to issue a new injunction. The organizati­on has asked that the injunction be issued on new grounds: that the defunding move violates the constituti­onal rights of Planned Parenthood and its patients.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States