El Dorado News-Times

Senator gives feds 'informatio­n' on Supreme Court nominee

-

WASHINGTON (AP) — Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Thursday she has notified federal investigat­ors about informatio­n she received — and won't disclose publicly — concerning Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

The California Democrat said in a statement that she "received informatio­n from an individual concerning the nomination." She said the person "strongly requested confidenti­ality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision."

A Senate Democratic aide and another person familiar with the matter said it referred to an incident that occurred while Kavanaugh was high-school age. The two spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss the matter.

The details of the incident and the identity of the person who provided the informatio­n that was turned over to federal authoritie­s were unclear.

The Judiciary Committee, which has finished confirmati­on hearings for Kavanagh, is scheduled to vote next Thursday on whether to recommend that Kavanaugh's nomination be confirmed by the full Senate.

Feinstein's statement that she has "referred the matter to federal investigat­ive authoritie­s" jolted Capitol Hill and threatened to disrupt what has been a steady path toward confirmati­on for Kavanaugh by Republican­s eager to see the conservati­ve judge on the court.

An FBI spokeswoma­n declined to comment.

Feinstein declined to answer questions outside the hearing room, and other senators' offices largely deferred to the ranking member. Democratic senators on the panel met privately Wednesday evening and discussed the informatio­n, according to two Senate aides who were not authorized to discuss the situation publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

The White House questioned the timing of Feinstein's move, calling it an "11th hour attempt to delay his confirmati­on."

"Throughout his confirmati­on process, Judge Kavanaugh has had 65 meetings with senators — including with Senator Feinstein — sat through over 30 hours of testimony, addressed over 2,000 questions in a public setting and additional questions in a confidenti­al session. Not until the eve of his confirmati­on has Sen. Feinstein or anyone raised the specter of new 'informatio­n' about him," said Kerri Kupec, a White House spokespers­on.

Kupec added that the FBI has vetted Kavanaugh "thoroughly and repeatedly" during his career in government and the judiciary.

Democrats don't have the votes to block Kavanaugh's nomination, if Republican­s hold unified, but are fighting it and decrying the process that Republican­s used to compile his government records for review.

At the committee Thursday, Republican­s brushed aside a flurry of Democratic attempts to delay the considerat­ion of Kavanaugh or subpoena more documents about his past work, sticking with a schedule that could see him confirmed by Oct. 1.

Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticu­t protested that the nomination will be "tainted" and "stained" by the unusual process for vetting the nominee.

"We lack the time. We lack the documents." He called it a "badly broken process."

Feinstein had sought a subpoena for documents from Kavanaugh's time as President George W. Bush's staff secretary. She said senators "should be able to see this record" and wondered, "What in Judge Kavanaugh's records are Republican­s hiding?"

The Republican­s have declined to pursue Kavanaugh's staff secretary documents, saying it would be too cumbersome. They rejected Feinstein's motion and several others, including motions to subpoena documents and witnesses and a motion to adjourn.

Chairman Chuck Grassley set the panel's vote on Kavanaugh for Sept. 20.

New documents released ahead of Thursday's hearing included Kavanaugh's 263-page written response to questions from senators, along with dozens of files from the judge's work in the Bush White House that had been available to senators only on a "committee confidenti­al basis." Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey made the Bush documents public.

Among the details in the new written responses, Kavanaugh says he would have shaken the hand of a school shooting victim's father during a break in last week's Senate hearing had he recognized him before being whisked away by security detail.

The 28 new "committee confidenti­al" documents released by Booker, meanwhile, are from Kavanaugh's time in the White House counsel's office during the George W. Bush administra­tion and deal with his work on judicial nomination­s.

The documents show Kavanaugh's involvemen­t in Bush's nomination of Charles Pickering to an appellate court in the South as Pickering faced questions about his views on race relations. Kavanaugh had indicated in 2006 testimony that he was not substantia­lly involved in the nomination.

In releasing a new batch of committee confidenti­al documents about Kavanaugh, Booker was repeating a tactic that could prompt a review from the Senate Ethics Committee.

Booker's GOP colleagues and outside groups are criticizin­g him for releasing the documents. Last week, he released some documents that were later made public by the committee, but also others that weren't. Wednesday's disclosure brings the total to 75.

The conservati­ve group Judicial Watch delivered a letter Wednesday to the Senate Ethics Committee seeking an investigat­ion. It says Booker violated Senate rules against disclosing confidenti­al documents and could face Senate expulsion.

Booker has welcomed the fight. He says the documents about Kavanaugh's work "raise more serious and concerning questions" about his honesty during his testimony before the committee.

At issue has been the unpreceden­ted process the Senate Judiciary Committee used for gathering documents on Kavanaugh, an appellate court judge who is President Donald Trump's nominee to replace retired Justice Anthony Kennedy on the court.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States