El Dorado News-Times

Clean Harbors cited in lawsuit against DoD

- By Caitlan Butler Staff Writer

Clean Harbors' El Dorado Incinerati­on Facility has been named in a lawsuit against the United States Department of Defense, which alleges that the DoD has approved the incinerati­on of toxic chemicals in violation of several federal laws.

Earthjusti­ce, a nonprofit environmen­tal law organizati­on headquarte­red in San Francisco filed a suit Thursday against the DoD and Sec. of Defense Mark Esper; the U.S. Defense Logistics Agency, which awards contracts for the DoD, and its director Darrell Williams; and Heritage Environmen­tal Services, LLC and Tradebe Treatment and Recycling, LLC, who were awarded contracts challenged in the lawsuit. Clean Harbors is not a defendant in the lawsuit.

The suit alleges that the DoD failed to conduct required environmen­tal reviews prior to awarding contracts to the LLCs named in the suit to dispose of PFAS-containing firefighti­ng foams by incinerati­ng them in violation of the National Environmen­tal Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Defense Authorizat­ion Act (NDAA). Earthjusti­ce hopes to gain access to the contracts for incinerati­on between the DoD and the LLCs.

Per- and polyfluoro­alkyl substances, known as PFAS, are man-made chemicals that have been in use in commercial goods since the 1940s in items like Teflon, water-repellent fabrics and the aforementi­oned firefighti­ng foams.

According to the Environmen­tal Protection Agency, there is evidence that exposure to PFAS can lead to adverse human health effects and the chemicals are persistent in both the human body and the environmen­t.

The firefighti­ng foams referenced in the lawsuit have recently been phased out of production by manufactur­ers due to their health effects in favor of foams made with different PFAS chemicals, per the EPA. The firefighti­ng foams that have been phased out are the ones bound for incinerati­on; they contain the PFAS chemicals PFOS (perfluoroo­ctane sulfonate), and the PFAS chemical PFOA (perfluoroo­ctanoic acid) is a byproduct of the foams' manufactur­ing process.

Alejandra Dávila Fragoso, National Communicat­ions Strategist for Earthjusti­ce, said the DoD has not been forthcomin­g about contracts for PFAS-containing firefighti­ng foam incinerati­on.

"We can say that it's very likely you've received PFAS at some point, but we don't know what DoD is doing right now because they haven't been forthcomin­g," he said.

The documented health effects of PFAS include reproducti­ve, developmen­tal, liver, kidney and immunologi­cal effects in lab animals. In humans, studies indicate increased cholestero­l levels consistent­ly, and in limited findings, have found effects related to infant birth weights, the immune system, PFOA-linked cancer and PFOS-linked thyroid hormone disruption.

The EPA notes that PFAS stay in the human body for an extended period and that the chemicals accumulate. According to the EPA, people are exposed to PFAS in a variety of ways, including through food, which can be contaminat­ed through the water and soil used to grow it, its consumer packaging and equipment used to process it; through the normal use, biodegrada­tion and disposal of consumer products containing PFAS; through working at a PFAS production facility or at a manufactur­ing facility that makes goods containing PFAS; and through contaminat­ed drinking water.

"Whole communitie­s have been drinking polluted water for a long time

— that's how we learned how terrible this was," Fragoso said. "And PFAS haven't been as studied as PFOS, just because they haven't been around for 50 years, but they're essentiall­y the same thing. It's part of the same class, same chemicals, and what we're seeing is that the health effects are very similar, too."

Phil Retallick, Clean Harbors' senior vice president for compliance and regulatory affairs, said the PFAS chemicals, including the firefighti­ng foam described in Earthjusti­ce's lawsuit, incinerate­d at the company's facility in El Dorado are not regulated as hazardous materials.

He said that the company's incinerato­r is "stateof-the-art" and "worldclass," noting that Clean Harbors must adhere to strict air emissions regulation­s from the EPA, which he said the company does. He said because of the advanced technology of the incinerato­rs at Clean Harbors, he is not concerned that PFAS chemicals pollute the environmen­t or pose a health risk.

"We don't have any concern with respect to the efficacy of incinerati­on to destroy those compounds," he said. "We're very confident that our state-of-the-art incinerato­rs like you have in our El Dorado facility are safe and effective in destroying this compound."

According to the EPA's Enforcemen­t and Compliance History Online tool, updated most recently in September 2019, the Clean Harbors incinerati­on facility in El Dorado has been out of compliance with the Clean Air Act four times in the past 12 quarters, or three years; out of compliance with the Clean Water Act five times in that period; and out of compliance with the Resource Conservati­on and Recovery Act nine times in that period. They are currently in compliance with the Clean Air Act, have a Clean Water Act violation identified and are a "significan­t noncomplie­r" of the

Resource Conservati­on and Recovery Act.

Retallick also said he cannot find any records of the El Dorado incinerati­on facility receiving shipments of the firefighti­ng foam from DoD described in the Earthjusti­ce lawsuit.

However, the lawsuit claims that a subcontrac­tor, Tradebe Treatment and Recycling, LLC received contracts from the DoD for PFAS incinerati­on, and that through the contracts, they may send the firefighti­ng foams for incinerati­on to any of eight incinerati­on facilities, one of which is Clean Harbors. It does not specifical­ly claim that Clean Harbors received the chemicals; just that they could have and were likely to have.

Retallick said the company's No. 1 priority is to be a good neighbor to those living in the communitie­s that host their facility.

"We're right here in the City of El Dorado, so we're a neighbor. We're a guest of the community, and our No. 1 job, our No. 1 important philosophy is to take care of and really protect the public's health and welfare," he said. "I think we've been doing that for decades, and the Arkansas DEQ [Department of Environmen­tal Quality] has and the data that we've released to the public shows that we do that."

Retallick said it is possible that PFAS chemicals, or items containing PFAS chemicals, are being or have been recently incinerate­d at the Clean Harbors facility here; however, since it is not regulated as a hazardous material, he said, it is not tracked the same way as hazardous materials.

 ?? Terrance Armstard / News-Times, file ?? Incinerato­r: In this December 2016 file photo, an employee walks across the Clean Harbors’ complex in El Dorado with the new technologi­cally advanced incinerato­r shown in the background. The company unveiled the new incinerato­r four years ago. Clean Harbors was recently named in a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense.
Terrance Armstard / News-Times, file Incinerato­r: In this December 2016 file photo, an employee walks across the Clean Harbors’ complex in El Dorado with the new technologi­cally advanced incinerato­r shown in the background. The company unveiled the new incinerato­r four years ago. Clean Harbors was recently named in a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States