El Dorado News-Times

Afghans, Taliban return to peace talks

- COMPILED BY DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE STAFF FROM WIRE REPORTS Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Kathy Gannon and Tameem Akhgar of The Associated Press; and by David Zucchino of The New York Times.

ISLAMABAD — With violence spiking, Afghanista­n’s warring sides have returned to the negotiatio­n table, ending more than a month of delays over hopes that the two sides can agree on a reduction of violence — and eventually, an outright cease-fire.

Taliban spokesman Mohammad Naeem tweeted Monday night that talks had resumed in the Middle Eastern state of Qatar, where the insurgent movement maintains a political office. There were no details other than the atmosphere was “cordial,” a commitment that negotiatio­ns should continue and an announceme­nt that the first item of business will be setting the agenda.

When talks ended abruptly in January, both sides submitted their wish lists for agendas. The task now is for the two sides to sift the respective wish lists, agree on items to negotiate and the order in which they will be tackled.

The priority for the Afghan government, Washington and NATO is a serious reduction in violence leading to a ceasefire. The Taliban have said it is negotiable, but until now have resisted any immediate ceasefire.

Washington is reviewing the February 2020 peace deal that former President Donald Trump’s administra­tion signed with the Taliban that calls for the final withdrawal of internatio­nal forces by May 1. The Taliban have resisted suggestion­s of even a brief extension, but a consensus is mounting in Washington for a delay in the withdrawal deadline.

Neither Washington nor NATO has announced a decision on the fate of an estimated 10,000 troops, including 2,500 American soldiers, still in Afghanista­n. The Biden administra­tion has emphasized a political solution to the protracted Afghan conflict, retained Zalmay Khalilzad, the man who negotiated the U.S. peace deal with the Taliban and until now avoided any definitive statements about the road forward.

Meanwhile, civilian casualties rose sharply in Afghanista­n after peace negotiatio­ns began in September, even as overall deaths and injuries dropped during 2020 compared with the previous year, the United Nations reported Tuesday.

In its annual report documentin­g civilian injuries and deaths, the United Nations’ mission in Afghanista­n found that the escalation in civilian casualties began shortly after intra-Afghan negotiatio­ns opened on Sept. 12 in Doha, Qatar, increasing by 45% in the final quarter of 2020 versus the same time period in 2019.

“2020 could have been the year of peace in Afghanista­n,” said Deborah Lyons, the special representa­tive of the U.N. secretary-general for Afghanista­n. “Instead, thousands of Afghan civilians perished due to the conflict.”

After last year’s peace agreement, the number of civilian casualties for the year was 15% lower than in 2019. The 8,820 civilian casualties documented in 2020 — 3,035 killed and 5,785 wounded — represente­d the first time since 2013 that this figure dropped below 10,000, the report said.

The decline was attributed to a reduction by the Taliban of mass casualty attacks in major cities and a decline in the number of U.S. airstrikes.

But civilian casualties surged in the fourth quarter as fighting raged in the countrysid­e between the Taliban and Afghan government forces. At the same time, a targeted assassinat­ion campaign of shootings and bombings killed government workers and security force members, journalist­s, civil society advocates and family members of combatants.

Also targeted were religious minorities, especially Hazaras, most of whom are Shiite Muslim, and the country’s small Sikh population.

The 2,792 civilian casualties — 891 deaths and 1,901 injuries — recorded in the final three months of 2020 represente­d the second-highest total for this time period since 2009.

The Taliban have denied targeted attacks against anyone other than government employees or supporters, but the Afghan government has blamed the militants for most such attacks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States