Trial of journalist in Iowa covering protest set to start
IOWA CITY, Iowa — An Iowa journalist faces trial Monday on charges stemming from her coverage of a protest against racial injustice, a case that prosecutors have pursued despite international condemnation from free press advocates who say she was just doing her job.
The case of Des Moines Register reporter Andrea Sahouri, who was pepper-sprayed and arrested while reporting on a clash between Black Lives Matter protesters and police, will highlight an aggressive response by Iowa authorities against those who organized and attended protests that broke out last summer and occasionally turned violent.
Sahouri, 25, and her former boyfriend are charged with failure to disperse and interference with official acts, misdemeanors that could bring fines and up to 30 days in jail. They face an estimated two-day trial at Drake University in what the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker says could be the first for a working journalist nationwide since 2018.
Sahouri’s newspaper, the Iowa Freedom of Information Council and Amnesty International are among press advocates that have demanded Polk County drop the charges, which they call an abuse of power that violates the Constitution’s First Amendment.
“This is outrageous. Reporting at a protest scene as a working member of the media is not a crime. It is a right that must be protected,” Amnesty International said.
But Des Moines police and County Attorney John Sarcone’s office have not backed down.
They argue that Sahouri wasn’t wearing press credentials and appeared to be a participant in an unlawful assembly, saying journalists do not have a free pass to ignore dispersal orders. The only such order identified in court documents was issued roughly 90 minutes before the arrest.
Sahouri, recently honored by the Iowa Newspaper Association as one of the state’s best young reporters, has continued to cover public safety while the charges have loomed.
While 126 journalists were arrested or detained during 2020’s unrest, most either weren’t charged or had the charges dropped, the Press Freedom Tracker says. Fourteen still face charges.
The determination to prosecute Sahouri has baffled observers, who note Iowa’s courts have a backlog of felony cases because of the coronavirus pandemic. Critics say authorities seem to be seeking a conviction to justify an officer’s decision to unnecessarily use force against a reporter known for building trust with crime victims and underrepresented communities.
“It’s like somebody with their hand in the cookie jar: They can’t admit that they made a mistake,” said Des Moines civil rights attorney Glen Downey, who is not involved in Sahouri’s case. “The case is important because of the journalism aspect, but it’s also emblematic of how they are treating all the protesters.”
Des Moines Register executive editor Carol Hunter said Sahouri’s lack of press credentials, which she left in her car, is a “red herring” because police knew immediately she was a journalist and a press badge isn’t required to enjoy constitutional protections. Reporters must be free to witness protests and hold participants and police accountable, Hunter said.
“Freedom of the press rests on newsgathering,” she said. “This really is an attack on a fundamental part of being able to bring people the news.”
The newspaper is funding Sahouri’s defense, which is led by former U.S. Attorney Nick Klinefeldt.
Prosecutors obtained and may try to show jurors text messages between Sahouri and protest leader Mate Muhammad from a week after her arrest.
Her lawyers say the texts are irrelevant and show a reporter’s routine fact-gathering with a source.
Muhammad, who has been fighting charges stemming from protests, said he didn’t know Sahouri when she was arrested but the two have since developed a professional relationship. He called her “extremely diligent” in vetting information and gathering different perspectives.
“We enjoy working with her not because we view her as an activist or on our side,” he said, “but because we view her as fair.”
Critics say authorities seem to be seeking a conviction to justify an officer’s decision to unnecessarily use force against a reporter known for building trust with crime victims and underrepresented communities.