El Dorado News-Times

Judge blocks enforcemen­t of mask mandate ban

- By John Lynch

A Pulaski County judge on Friday barred authoritie­s from enforcing the state’s recently enacted ban on government mask mandates for the time being.

The face-covering ban appears to be illegal because the law discrimina­tes against public-school children, usurps judicial authority, limits gubernator­ial emergency powers and infringes on the power of county officials — all constituti­onal violations — Pulaski County Circuit Judge Tim Fox ruled.

Fox’s order is temporary, lasting until a full trial can be held on the legality of Act 1002 of 2021, which was passed in April by the General Assembly to prohibit government agencies from requiring masks, which have been generally seen as a deterrent to prevent the spread of the coronaviru­s.

That proceeding has not been scheduled, but the judge said he wants to get it over with as soon as possible so the Arkansas Supreme Court can make the final ruling on the inevitable appeal of whatever he does decide.

Gov. Asa Hutchinson, who recently said he regrets sign

ing Act 1002, praised Fox’s decision, calling it limited, well-reasoned and constituti­onally based.

Hutchinson said he would not enact a statewide mask mandate, though the ruling gave him the authority to use his emergency powers to do so.

“[Act 1002] needed to be changed because of the new reality with the delta variant, but it failed to recognize the limits on legislativ­e authority over the different branches of our state government,” the Republican governor said.

The ruling came hours after lawmakers gaveled out of a special session that Hutchinson called for the purpose of allowing local school boards to implement masking protocols for academic facilities where children under 12 are present. Lawmakers left without enacting legislatio­n granting that flexibilit­y.

Act 1002 has been in effect for about 1 1/2 weeks, barring all government entities from requiring face coverings with exceptions for prisons, juvenile detention facilities and state healthcare operations.

Veronica McClane and Ashley Simmons, parents of children too young to be vaccinated, the school districts of Little Rock and Marion County along with Pulaski County Judge Barry Hyde and Sheriff Eric Higgins all challenged the law, with Fox joining their separate lawsuits into a single case at Friday’s hearing.

The parents and schools complained that the mask-requiremen­t ban prevented them from protecting children, especially ones too young for the vaccine, from COVID infection while the sheriff and county judge said the prohibitio­n interferes with their efforts to keep county offices and the jail safe.

The ban “violates the equal protection provisions of Article 2 of the Arkansas Constituti­on, in that it discrimina­tes, without a rational basis, between minors in public schools and minors in private schools,” where mask requiremen­ts are permitted, the judge stated in his decision.

The law also conflicts with Amendment 55, which gives county judges authority over county property, and Amendment 80, which makes the state Supreme Court solely responsibl­e for judicial rule-making, including any decision about requiring face coverings for courts, the judge said.

“Act 1002 of 2021 … facially violates the separation of powers clause in that it attempts to usurp the constituti­onal authority granted to county judges over county buildings and property [and] the exclusive superinten­ding authority concerning the procedures and conduct of the courts of the state that is granted to the Arkansas Supreme Court,” Fox stated in his four-page ruling.

Further, the ban illegally usurps the governor’s emergency powers, Fox stated.

Friday’s hearing lasted about an hour and included restrictio­ns on attendance to allow for social distancing in the courtroom. Fox required everyone to be masked and limited attendance, limiting the number of attorneys in attendance as well as spectators.

The judge had planned to broadcast the proceeding­s over the Internet to make them publicly accessible, but technical difficulti­es prevented that, which included someone broadcasti­ng “worse than inappropri­ate things” over the video link establishe­d by the court, Fox said. The judge said he will refer the matter to law enforcemen­t.

State lawyers were reviewing Fox’s ruling and determinin­g how to proceed late Friday.

Hutchinson was named in the suit in his official capacity alongside House Speaker Matthew Shepherd, R-El Dorado, and Senate President Pro Tempore Jimmy Hickey, R-Texarkana.

Asked whether he would make a court filing in support of keeping Fox’s ruling in place, Hutchinson said he would need to see how the case develops before determinin­g whether he should have representa­tion separate from Attorney General Leslie Rutledge’s office. If the case is appealed to the state Supreme Court, there would be a conflict, and Hutchinson said he wanted to be able to have his “independen­t voice.”

“I want to be able to speak to the court directly about my views on Act 1002,” he said.

In response to Fox’s rulings, local government entities began implementi­ng mask mandates on Friday. Hyde, the Pulaski County judge, said that he was reinstatin­g a mask mandate effective Monday in all county buildings “unless you are vaccinated and have the wristband issued” by county human resources officials.

Speaking for local government­s around the state, Mark Hayes, executive director of the Arkansas Municipal League, called Fox’s decision Friday a win for local control — one of the top issues for the league.

“The entire structure of our government in this state is to allow local government­s to be responsive as quickly as possible in a matter of crisis,” Hayes said. “And when there are preemption­s to that it usually causes — just from a practical standpoint — a very difficult set of circumstan­ces.”

Now freed up to do so by Fox’s ruling, Hayes said he expects government bodies around the state institute mask mandates especially at county jails, courtrooms, city halls and some sporting events.

“I don’t know if it will go as far as it did when we first started all this, but I do think you’ll see some of those things pop up across the state,” Hayes said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States