El Dorado News-Times

Judges bar Tennessee reason ban of abortion

- JONATHAN MATTISE

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A panel of federal judges reversed course Friday and blocked a Tennessee restrictio­n that outlaws abortions because of a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, or because of the race or gender of the fetus. The ruling also kept a six-week abortion ban blocked.

Tennessee Republican Gov. Bill Lee enacted the restrictio­ns last year as part of a sweeping anti-abortion measure. The law gained national attention because it banned abortion as early as six weeks — making it one of the strictest in the country — but it included several other components.

In its multiprong­ed decision, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati affirmed previous rulings that have blocked the state’s six-week abortion ban. The law states that if the six-week ban is deemed unconstitu­tional — a time frame when most people don’t know they’re pregnant — then the ban would begin at various other gestationa­l stages.

“We take note that state legislatur­es recently have passed more anti-abortion regulation­s than perhaps at any other time in this country’s history. However, this developmen­t is not a signal to the courts to change course,” Senior Judge Martha Craig Daughtrey wrote for the majority. “It is, in fact, just the opposite. The judiciary exists as a check on majoritari­an rule.”

Abortion-rights groups said the decisions bring some relief in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court allowing Texas’ near-ban on abortions to take effect. The U.S. Department of Justice has sued over the Texas law, which allows any private citizen to sue Texas abortion providers who violate the law, as well as anyone who “aids or abets” a woman or girl getting the procedure. The two Tennessee restrictio­ns include felony penalties for physicians found in violation.

“The court of appeals today rightly respected nearly 50 years of precedent by blocking these dangerous laws,” said Brigitte Amiri, deputy director of the ACLU’s Reproducti­ve Freedom Project. “With all eyes on the devastatin­g effect of Texas’ abortion ban, this is welcome news for Tennessean­s and the rule of law.”

Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

The 6th Circuit’s ruling on the so-called reasons ban marked a turnaround.

The six-week ban and the reasons ban were immediatel­y blocked by a lower federal court just hours after Lee signed the package into law. However, a 6th Circuit panel ruled later last year that the state could enforce the reasons ban while abortion rights groups continue their court battle against it. Two of the three judges in Friday’s decision were not part of the previous ruling.

The new ruling says the reasons ban does not give medical profession­als “a reasonable opportunit­y to know when they are permitted to perform an abortion.”

“As a result of this ambiguity and uncertaint­y, many abortion providers might well choose to steer clear of anything that could possibly be construed as prohibited conduct, effectuati­ng the inaccessib­ility of a right deemed fundamenta­l under the Constituti­on,” Daughtrey wrote.

All three judges agreed to keep the six-week ban blocked. Judge Amul Thapar dissented on the reasons ban but also broadly addressed abortion, writing that “the courts should return this choice to the American people — where it belongs.”

“The state legislatur­es can do what we can’t: listen to the community, create fact-specific rules with appropriat­e exceptions, gather more evidence, and update their laws if things don’t work properly,” Thapar wrote. “And if the public is unhappy, it can fight back at the ballot box.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States