El Dorado News-Times

The conservati­ve populist coalition has grown in Pennsylvan­ia

- SALENA ZITO Columnist

FANNETTSBU­RG, Pennsylvan­ia — The first time I accidental­ly stumbled onto the cracked Back Road street sign in this Franklin County unincorpor­ated town years ago, while covering the 2012 presidenti­al race between then-President Barack Obama and Sen. Mitt Romney, I knew I had to turn onto it even though I had no idea where it led.

It was impulsive but proved helpful in taking my reporting in a different direction, to understand what voters were thinking. It helped me understand, with all of the potential of flipping this state red, why voters were using their energy and dissatisfa­ction with Obama to decide to sit that race out, but not to vote for his opponent.

To understand what happened in last week’s Pennsylvan­ia primaries, some of that history is instructiv­e.

Four years earlier, even in the rural counties, a coalition of voters found themselves moved by Obama’s promise of hope and change as well as the historical implicatio­ns of electing the first black president, even if he was not their cup of tea on policies. Two years later in 2010, they still liked him personally, but still not his policies. As a consequenc­e, they handed his Democratic Party a huge shellackin­g in this state’s Senate, gubernator­ial and House races.

By the time of the presidenti­al election in 2012, it was clear voters — Republican­s, culturally conservati­ve Democrats, and independen­ts — were even more unhappy with his policies. My question to voters then was whether Romney could awaken the sleeping giant of this yet-unnamed coalition of voters and persuade them to cast their ballots for him.

In the end, Romney failed to show those voters he would have their backs; they were waiting for him to do that, flirted with the possibilit­y, but ultimately just stayed home when he came across as the guy who would bring the empty box to your desk rather than save your job. Obama won here, but by 284,000 fewer votes than he did in 2008. The migration away from Democrats was in motion.

Former President Donald Trump, on the other hand, swept in here in 2016 with the guidance of people who knew the state, and he was able to draw out just enough voters in a series of counties that had gone from strongly supporting Obama in 2008 to supporting him tepidly in 2012. That’s how Trump squeaked out a win.

While most of the focus on Pennsylvan­ia four years later, in 2020, was on Trump falling back from those heights and thus narrowly losing the state to President Joe Biden, what was missed is that Republican­s did really, really well down-ballot. They won two statewide offices in races for which they had very little money, held two congressio­nal seats that had been predicted to fall to the Democrats, and gained state legislativ­e seats they weren’t even trying hard to gain.

In short, the conservati­ve populist coalition — formed by frustrated Main Street Republican­s, centrist Democrats and independen­t voters — grew, not shrank, despite Trump losing in the state. It grew again in the 2021 municipal races here last fall, where Republican­s won in places they had never won before, sweeping county row offices in traditiona­l western Democratic counties and regaining spots in suburban Philadelph­ia collar counties where they had been bleeding Republican voters in the past few election cycles.

In 2018, the Democrats had a slight blip: They held the governor’s office and a U.S. Senate seat thanks to statewide candidates Tom Wolf (for governor) and Bob Casey (for Senate) being able to hide their progressiv­e cards close to their vest. It didn’t hurt Casey and Wolf to have two very different yet weak Republican candidates running against them.

Which brings us to today. The primary race in both elections taught us several things, beginning with the Democrats. John Fetterman, who eventually won the nomination for U.S. Senate, was never the favorite of party bosses, going back to when he won his first race for mayor of Braddock by a single absentee ballot. While the establishm­ent bosses spent their time not liking him, he spent his time going across the state talking, and listening, to voters in places like here in Franklin County.

His opponent Conor Lamb’s campaign will go

down in history as the worst campaign for Senate in either party, ever. His message, that he was the most electable, is hardly inspiratio­nal for the most activist party base, and neither is traveling around the state to garner endorsemen­ts from other politician­s. It is not 1992.

Had Fetterman faced insurgent Republican candidate Kathy Barnette in the fall, he would have crushed her because of questions about her credibilit­y and judgment. But in this environmen­t of staggering inflation, historical­ly high gas prices, and a crisis at the border that is bringing hideous amounts of fentanyl into the Pennsylvan­ian corridor while our 401(k)s are evaporatin­g before our eyes, Fetterman will struggle against either Dr. Mehmet Oz or Dave McCormick, who are headed for a recount in the Republican battle. However, I would never underestim­ate Fetterman.

Republican­s could pick up a couple of new House seats: Keep an eye on Guy Ciarrocchi in Chester County in the 6th Congressio­nal District and Mike Doyle in the 12th District. The energy also favors the Republican­s. More of them showed in the primary last Tuesday despite Democrats having 500,000 more registered voters, which itself is a registrati­on advantage that has shrunk by nearly a million over the past few years.

The governor’s race between Democrat and current Attorney General Josh Shapiro and Republican state Sen. Doug Mastriano is the only major race in the state that heavily favors the Democrats. Mastriano is well outside the right wing of the party and has demonstrat­ed more interest in conspiraci­es than building a coalition to win or allowing the press to cover his campaign.

While nuance is dead in American reporting, the truth is a Trump voter can often believe he was a great president and still be ready to move on; both of those sentiments are fairly common.

The conservati­ve populist coalition, which is flourishin­g in this state, was never formed because of him. Trump was not the cause but the result, which means the story about Pennsylvan­ia this fall will be about the voters and not Trump.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States