El Dorado News-Times

Roe being overturned should serve as a call to action

-

In a dreaded and once-unfathomab­le decision, the Supreme Court on Friday overturned Roe v. Wade. It’s a dark time in America as this once-revered institutio­n has taken the rare and awful path of depriving people of their rights.

With its 5-4 decision the court abolished the constituti­onal right to an abortion up to the point of viability of the fetus outside the womb, forcing the nation back 50 years to a time when state legislator­s decided whether to allow pregnant women control over their bodies.

Or maybe the court has taken us back even further in time. Part of the justificat­ion for overturnin­g Roe was because centuries of history indicate abortion was criminaliz­ed. “When the majority says that we must read our foundation­al charter as viewed at the time of ratificati­on (except that we may also check it against the Dark Ages), it consigns women to second-class citizenshi­p,” the three dissenting justices wrote.

The decision was not a surprise, because a draft had been leaked earlier this year. But it’s devastatin­g nonetheles­s that the Supreme Court has chosen to take away a constituti­onal right. The repercussi­ons will be quick and severe: 13 states have trigger laws and others have pre-Roe bans still on the books. In Arkansas, Missouri, Kentucky, Louisiana and Mississipp­i — the state that brought the case that led to the ruling Friday — the ban will go into effect within hours of Roe being overturned.

Even if we don’t return to the time of back-alley abortions, what’s ahead is uncertaint­y. For those living in states that outlaw or severely restrict the procedure, getting an abortion will now involve traveling hundreds of miles

out of state to find care — with all the attendant costs — or obtaining medical abortion pills. But obtaining the drugs through the mail might be considered a crime under these state laws and subject to prosecutio­n. Some states are considerin­g how to ban the pills.

As always, abortion restrictio­ns fall heaviest on those who already have trouble accessing healthcare — people of color, people in rural areas, disabled people and those with low incomes who have less ability to pay for the procedure as well as arrange for child care and time off from work while they go to another state for abortion care.

This is not a simple matter of returning a controvers­ial issue to the states to decide, as Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. makes it sound in his opinion. The Supreme Court is depriving people of the right to control their own bodies and allowing state politics to determine the existence of a fundamenta­l liberty.

Roe v. Wade guaranteed the right to choose a path — to either end or continue a pregnancy. It is incalculab­le how much that freedom, that opportunit­y, that choice to control one’s body shapes a person’s life.

The three liberal justices who dissented in this decision — Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — ended their opinion with this heartbreak­ing coda: “With sorrow — for this Court, but more, for the many millions of American women who have today lost a fundamenta­l constituti­onal protection — we dissent.”

So be angry about what the court did. Feel betrayed that Brett M. Kavanaugh, Neil M. Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett all said during their Senate confirmati­on hearings that Roe was a precedent, which many took to mean they wouldn’t seek to overturn it.

The conservati­ves on the court have forced this nation back to an age that most Americans don’t remember well, if at all. The work now falls on this generation to restore the right to abortion and personal freedom.

What abortion rights advocates are doing — and what everyone should be focused on — is how to make abortion accessible across the nation in a post-Roe world. Dozens of organizati­ons across the country are raising money to help needy people without means to travel for an abortion.

A number of states have introduced motions to enshrine the right to abortion in their constituti­ons. California is one of them. Legislator­s here have also introduced bills to help fund abortions and thwart other states’ efforts to criminaliz­e any of their residents when they seek abortions in this state.

The Biden administra­tion is exploring options to help women get abortions as well — including declaring a public health emergency, which might protect doctors in states that allow abortion when they provide the procedure to people from states that don’t allow it.

The Food and Drug Administra­tion already allows abortion pills to be shipped to a person after a telehealth consultati­on. There is a move afoot to get the Food and Drug Administra­tion to declare that its federal authorizat­ion of the use and shipment of the drugs nationwide overrides any state trying to ban the sale or receipt of them. Sadly, the Women’s Health Protection Act, a federal bill that would ensure the right to an abortion, was voted down in the Senate recently.

This is just the beginning of a battle over reproducti­ve rights in America, and possibly for other rights as well. In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the court should reconsider landmark decisions on contracept­ion, sodomy laws and same-sex marriage. If that seems unthinkabl­e, consider how unlikely it seemed even a year ago that Roe vs. Wade would fall.

Dark times, indeed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States