Relying too heavily on Curry might not be smart

Let’s just call the Warriors’ season debut inauspicious.

It’s too early to push the panic button — no judgment can be reasonably levied on these Warriors until Draymond Green hits the floor — but you also cannot ignore the fact that just about everything that could go wrong did go wrong in the Dubs’ 125-99 blowout loss to the Brooklyn Nets on Tuesday night.

The contest was never close, as the Nets’ dynamic duo of Kyrie Irving and Kevin Durant (remember him?) took whatever they wanted against a porous Warriors’ defense.

All while Stephen Curry tried to outdo both stars himself.

Curry had no choice. He received no help Tuesday.

And if this trend doesn’t change, fast, it could be a long season in the Bay.

Complain about the offensive game plan or play- calling all you want, Warriors fans — you should know by now that players win games.

It doesn’t matter if Curry is on or off the ball to start a possession

when the Warriors’ best offense requires him to dribble between four defenders and make a layup as he takes a forearm to the neck.

And Steve Kerr can’t call a play that will fix Andrew Wiggins’ footwork or allow Kelly Oubre to make a shot that’s not a dunk.

Curry was able to create space for his teammates Tuesday — the gravity was there — at least in the first half, when he was trying his hardest. His teammates weren’t able to do anything with it.

Man, did the Warriors miss Klay Thompson.

Wiggins is being asked to slide into the No. 2 role

in the Warriors offense, behind Curry, with the loss of Thompson this season.

But Wiggins’ performance was reminiscent of a different kind of No. 2 in the season opener, shooting 4- of-16 from the floor, and posting as many turnovers (four) as rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks combined.

All this, while the Nets dared him to shoot it.

When asked to lead the team with Curry on the bench, Wiggins was perhaps the fourth or fifth best player on the floor. The Warriors were outscored by 28 points with him playing, and to anyone who watched the game that number seemed low.

Oubre, acquired in the immediate aftermath of Thompson’s injury, was

only marginally better. He missed all seven of his shots that were not at the rim and he missed four that were at the rim. But at least he had a cool dunk and pulled down some rebounds.

Of course, against a team like the Nets, the Warriors’ struggles were more pronounced. Durant looks like the player that won two NBA Finals MVPs in Oakland — arguably the greatest scorer in NBA history. Irving’s handles and shot creation take a backseat to few in history. The Nets’ depth is prodigious, too. Their second unit could probably compete for a playoff spot in the East. That team, with a bit of refinement on the defensive side, can win a title this season.

So while the Warriors were bad Tuesday, I can say with certainty that not every game will look that bad — not every opponent will be as good as the Nets. (Though in the Western Conference, there are a lot of teams that will come close.)

But the Nets’ excellence doesn’t come close to explaining why the Warriors looked light years behind Tuesday.

It was reminiscent of the start of last season. And if it’s a sign of what’s to come this season, the Warriors’ campaign could well be as miserable as the last.

Then again, there’s a reason the Warriors went out and landed Durant — a player who can get buckets without an offense — back in 2016.