A political recall — but there are other issues
Proponents of the recall of Andrew Coolidge claim “fiscal irresponsibility,” but I don’t know if that’s genuine. One supporter admitted to KRCR News, “the best way to break the cabal that is anti-progressive is to get rid of Coolidge.”
This recall looks completely political. Concerned about fiscal matters? Why not take on the onerous and regressive general sales tax measure that staff proposed and council greedily approved for the 2022 ballot?
Let’s talk about fiscal irresponsibility. Council just approved raises for the police department, in exchange for those employees paying more toward their pension share. Unfortunately, the raise was bigger than the increased share. This is how the Unfunded Actuarial Liability, aka pension deficit, grows. Every raise increases the base. The tiny extra contribution from the employee goes like spit on a griddle as the UAL increases by millions a year, with staff allocating money from our infrastructure and services to make increasing “extra” payments toward THEIR pensions.
The UAL was created and is perpetually increased by this type of mismanagement. As long as council is led by staff, who stand to gain with every contract, we will be stuck in this downward debt spiral. Coolidge’s irresponsible suggestion to use sales tax revenues to secure bonds will increase our debt by millions.
Adding insult to injury, the city is using The People’s money to run their tax campaign, since the FPPC has relinquished responsibility to enforce election laws.
Let your district representative know how you feel about this grab.
— Juanita Sumner, Chico