Enterprise-Record (Chico)

Budget won’t cover out-of-state abortion travel to California

- By Adam Beam

While Gov. Gavin Newsom has pledged to make California a sanctuary for women seeking abortions, his administra­tion won’t spend public money to help people from other states travel to California for the procedure.

Newsom’s decision, included in a budget agreement reached over the weekend, surprised abortion advocates who have been working with the governor for nearly a year to prepare for a potential surge of patients from other states coming to California for abortions now that the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade.

California’s operating budget, which is scheduled for a vote in the state Legislatur­e on Wednesday, includes $20 million for an “Abortion Practical Support Fund” to pay for things like airfare, lodging, gas and meals for people seeking abortions in California. But the money can only be used to help people who already live in California, not people traveling from other states. The fund will accept private donations, but it’s unclear if that money can cover out-ofstate travel expenses.

A spokespers­on from Newsom’s office said the governor chose to focus on strengthen­ing and expanding California’s existing abortion services. During a news conference on Friday, Newsom noted the budget contains tens of millions of dollars to support the state’s abortion clinics — funding he said could free up their budgets so they could use their own money to help women travel to California.

“We’re being realistic. You’re going to ask, ‘Are we going to pay for everyone’s travel and accommodat­ions for 33 million people, of which 10% may seek care in California?’ Come on. We have to be realistic about what we can absorb,” Newsom said.

California’s budget includes $40 million to cover abortions for women who can’t afford them, including women from other states who travel to California. But Jessica Pinckney, executive director of Access Reproducti­ve Justice, a California nonprofit that helps women pay for the logistics of an abortion, said travel is often one of the biggest barriers women face in seeking reproducti­ve care.

“Including out-of-state travel is absolutely necessary to reduce the barriers and burdens to those who are coming from hostile states,” she said.

Travel within California is important too, she said, because 40% of the state’s 58 counties don’t have abortion clinics, accounting for 3% of California’s female population. Many of them are lowincome.

“There certainly is a benefit to having in-state travel financial support for California­ns,” she said. “But the out-of-state piece really gets at the folks who are being impacted by the fall of Roe.”

While the state Legislatur­e will likely approve the state budget on Wednesday, lawmakers can still make changes to it later. The current budget proposal allows the Abortion Practical Support Fund to also accept private donations. Democratic state Sen. Nancy Skinner’s office said they would try to clarify that at least the private money could be used to cover out-of-state travel expenses.

 ?? RICH PEDRONCELL­I — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Gov. Gavin Newsom displays a bill that shields abortion providers and volunteers in California from civil judgements from out-of-state courts in Sacramento, on June 24.
RICH PEDRONCELL­I — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Gov. Gavin Newsom displays a bill that shields abortion providers and volunteers in California from civil judgements from out-of-state courts in Sacramento, on June 24.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States