Enterprise-Record (Chico)

Democrats swiftly raised $80M after court overturned Roe v. Wade

- By Brian Slodysko

In the first week after the Supreme Court stripped away a woman’s constituti­onal right to have an abortion, Democrats and aligned groups raised more than $80 million, a tangible early sign that the ruling may energize voters.

But party officials say donors are giving much of that money to national campaigns and causes instead of races for state office, where abortion policy will now be shaped as a result of the court’s decision. That’s where Republican­s wield disproport­ionate power after more than a decade of plunging money and resources into critical but often-overlooked contests.

The fundraisin­g disparity offers an example of how a lack of long-term planning can lead to both a structural disadvanta­ge and an exasperate­d Democratic base. Short of the votes to pass legislatio­n through a gridlocked and narrowly divided Congress, the right to abortion now appears to be the latest issue ceded largely to the states. That’s after failed Democratic efforts to expand voting rights, limit gerrymande­ring and significan­tly stiffen gun laws.

“We can no longer afford Democrats’ systemic neglect of down-ballot races — not when Republican­s are eager to intrude on our health care decisions, bedrooms, and marriages,” said Gabrielle Chew, a spokespers­on for the Democratic Legislativ­e Campaign Committee, which helps finance state legislativ­e races. “This should be a wake-up call.”

The massive $80 million fundraisin­g haul was recorded by ActBlue, the Democrats’ online fundraisin­g platform, which has a ticker that shows in real time the money passing through the organizati­on. ActBlue took in over $20 million in the first 24 hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that determined abortion was a constituti­onal right. By Tuesday, the group had processed more than $51 million in donations, and by Friday, the total had reached $80 million.

In fact, all major Democratic campaign committees reported a surge in contributi­ons after the ruling, including those working on state-level as well as federal races. Planned Parenthood, too.. But few have been willing to release hard numbers.

WinRed, the online fundraisin­g portal for the Republican Party, did not respond to an inquiry about the party’s fundraisin­g since the court’s decision.

The fundraisin­g disparity is nothing new between Democratic groups working for state candidates and those focusing on national issues after a defining moment. For example, ActBlue took in more than $71 million in just 24 hours after the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, little of which went to groups working on state-level campaigns.

Consider the case of Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison, who in 2020 shattered fundraisin­g records in his long-shot bid to oust Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and head to Congress in Washington. Harrison ended up losing the race by more than 10 points. He raised more than $57 million in the closing months of his campaign, including one 24-hour period in which he raised over $1 million.

But for statehouse­s? The Democratic Governors Associatio­n announced it had raised $200,000 after the court’s decision last week. The organizati­on said Thursday that it was on pace to raise $1 million before the start of the long Fourth of July weekend, which is less the other committees focused on national races.

The Democratic Legislativ­e Campaign Committee, which raises money for state races across the country, declined to say how much it has taken in since the court decision. But its past fundraisin­g figures demonstrat­e how underresou­rced the group is.

The DLCC raised $650,000 in the 48 hours after a leaked copy of the court’s decision surfaced in May. Earlier this year, it celebrated when announcing it had raised nearly $6 million in the final three months of last year.

Its GOP counterpar­t, the Republican State Leadership Committee, raised more than twice that during the same period last year.

“When Democrats (spend) 1-to-1 with Republican­s in legislativ­e races, we win them,” said Greg Goddard, a Florida Democrat who raises money for national and state campaigns. “But when it’s 3-to-1, or 4-to1, we get clobbered.”

 ?? NIKOS FRAZIER — QUAD CITY TIMES ?? Abortion rights protesters demonstrat­e in Vander Veer Park in Davenport, Iowa.
NIKOS FRAZIER — QUAD CITY TIMES Abortion rights protesters demonstrat­e in Vander Veer Park in Davenport, Iowa.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States