Enterprise-Record (Chico)

Judge declines to delay Trump's New York hush money trial over complaints of pretrial publicity

- By Jennifer Peltz and Michael R. Sisak

The judge in Donald Trump's hush money criminal case on Friday turned down the former president's request to postpone his trial because of publicity about the case.

It's the latest in a string of delay denials that Trump has gotten from various courts this week as he fights to stave off the trial's start Monday with jury selection.

Among other things, Trump's lawyers had argued that the jury pool was deluged with what the defense saw as “exceptiona­lly prejudicia­l” news coverage of the case. The defense maintained that was a reason to hold off the case indefinite­ly.

Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pretrial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”

Pointing to Trump's two federal defamation trials and a state civil fraud trial in Manhattan within the past year, Merchan wrote

that the ex-president himself “was personally responsibl­e for generating much, if not most, of the surroundin­g publicity with his public statements” outside those courtrooms and on social media.

“The situation Defendant finds himself in now is not new to him and at least in part, of his own doing,” the judge added. He said questionin­g of prospectiv­e jurors would address any concerns about their ability to be fair and impartial.

Messages seeking comment were left with Trump's lawyers. The Manhattan district attorney's office, which is prosecutin­g the case, declined to comment.

Trump, meanwhile, said Friday that he planned to testify at the trial, calling the case a “scam.”

“All I can do is tell the truth,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. “And the truth is, they have no case.”

Asked about jury selection, Trump said the process is “largely luck.”

“It depends who you get,” Trump said.

“It's very unfair that I'm having a trial there,” he said, reiteratin­g complaints he has made about the judge.

In a court filing last month, Trump lawyer Todd Blanche had argued that “potential jurors in Manhattan

have been exposed to huge amounts of biased and unfair media coverage relating to this case.”

“Many of the potential jurors already wrongfully believe that President Trump is guilty,” Blanche added, citing the defense's review of media articles and other research it conducted.

Blanche said the review found 1,223 articles published online about the case from mid-January to late February and that many of them “unfairly and improperly `demonized'” Trump. However, a chart included in a defense submission included many mentions of terms relevant to the case, such as 207 references to “Manhattan Trial” and 142 to “Hush Money Payments.”

Trump's lawyers also blamed key prosecutio­n witnesses Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels for driving negative coverage of Trump. They pointed to Cohen's withering criticism of Trump on his podcasts and social media feeds and to publicity surroundin­g the release of a documentar­y about Daniels, which premiered last month on the NBC streaming service Peacock.

 ?? SETH WENIG — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Judge Juan Merchan poses for a picture in his chambers in New York on March 14.
SETH WENIG — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Judge Juan Merchan poses for a picture in his chambers in New York on March 14.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States