Fast Company

4 AN EQUITABLE TRANSITION TO A GREEN NEW DEAL

AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN BUILDING TRADES UNIONS AND THE WIND GIANT ØRSTED CREATES A TEMPLATE FOR ESTABLISHI­NG GOOD-PAYING JOBS IN RENEWABLE INFRASTRUC­TURE.

-

Last November, Danish renewable energy giant Ørsted reached an agreement with North America’s Building Trades Unions: The company would hire union members for a series of upcoming U.S. projects. NABTU represents 3 million workers in 14 unions, including electrical, bricklayin­g, cement, masonry, and more—a group historical­ly skeptical of renewable energy because of its potential to disrupt members’ jobs. The three-part deal, which is still being ironed out, will have NABTU members fabricatin­g, erecting, and setting up the power grid for wind projects. It was negotiated by NABTU president Sean Mcgarvey, who says the deal “pulls the curtain back” on how the renewable industry can turn a profit while paying its builders a fair wage— and, in turn, rally support for the transition to green energy among the workers who will need to build out the infrastruc­ture. This is how it’ll work.

PROPER TRAINING

Mcgarvey says his members are fully capable of pivoting to building green energy components— “We build data centers, nuclear power plants, bridges, hospitals, you name it”—but will require some training to adapt to new settings. Ørsted will train workers on how to perform tasks 40 to 50 miles out at sea—and ideally provide salaries that reflect the fact that they’ll be on location for 18 to 36 days at a time.

COMPARABLE WAGES

The biggest hurdle for trade workers, Mcgarvey says, has been the unwillingn­ess of renewable companies to pay wages that match those offered by the fossil fuel industry. By negotiatin­g fair salaries through NABTU, Mcgarvey hopes Ørsted will show that companies “can pay middle-class sustaining wages with benefits via their collective bargaining agreements and still make money.”

ADDED BENEFITS

Mcgarvey acknowledg­es that one advantage of working with Ørsted is the company’s European roots—where workers often have seats on company boards (at Ørsted, they hold three) and even have partial ownership in the companies they work for through pension investment­s. “When we have conversati­ons with our counterpar­ts in Europe, they’re aghast at how some of these companies behave in the United States,” Mcgarvey says. “But Ørsted approached us with this mentality where they not only want to win for their shareholde­rs, they want to win for their employees, the people they do business with, and for the communitie­s in which they operate.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States