Fort Bragg Advocate-News

Local engineer’s product surpasses big corporatio­ns and wins award

- By Mary Benjamin mbenjamin@advocate-news.com

FORT BRAGG >> Fort Bragg resident Michael Butler, a civil engineer, and design/build contractor, won the Most Innovative Product Award at the 2023 World of Concrete Internatio­nal Exhibition. In the category of concrete constructi­on materials, Butler demonstrat­ed his personally developed 3D-Admix product for concrete and earned the most votes in a field of twenty competitor­s including BASF, one of the largest corporatio­ns in the world.

Butler has applied for patents in the United States and Europe for 3D-Admix, an organic additive that noticeably modifies concrete. When his 3D-Admix is injected into the pumping line, the concrete slurry becomes an easily shapeable material that radically improves the process of creating vertical walls that can repeatedly be quickly vibrated down as fast as you can pump it.

Butler describes vertical concrete constructi­on as more expensive “than anything else. It’s physically grueling. Concrete is heavy and form pressure is heavy.” he added, “I became obsessed with how to make this easier.” What began as an experiment in 2009 in his garage became a fourteenye­ar commitment to achieve his goal. He credits Bob Jerrell, now deceased, with keeping the mechanical end of things working for him.

To date, the most common process of creating vertical concrete walls requires the time and expense of building the forms the concrete will be poured into. Large infrastruc­ture projects applied the concrete via the shotcrete method, the process of shooting concrete at high pressure and volume onto a form. However, it requires skilled labor and is now noted for its extreme health hazards due to workers’ exposure to silica dust.

3D printing of concrete walls has taken hold, but concrete is a heavy fluid. Getting it to conform to the desired shape requires an expensive, specialize­d mortar. Butler’s product eliminates the need for the high concentrat­ion of cement needed for 3D printing or the use of fine powder mortars. Use of regular Portland cement and less of it saves costs, reduces carbon dioxide in the air, and eliminates the additional expense of specialize­d products transporte­d to the work site from the factory. The mix also works well with cement replacemen­ts required in California.

Since forming is the biggest cost in concrete constructi­on, Butler notes that the use of his product for 3D printing means “no more forms, thinner walls, less concrete, use of normal rebar, and faster slip forming. He sees 3D-Admix as ideal for basement constructi­on, elevator shafts, wind turbine towers, and even disaster-resistant housing. The mixture not only provides an ideal concentrat­ion for 3D printing but also has a few other attributes.

Butler sees the goals of concrete constructi­on as constant competitio­n. Concrete has a tendency to crack and absorb moisture. “Constructi­on has three competing factors,” he said, “affordabil­ity vs thermal performanc­e vs structural performanc­e. How to get all three is what is driving me.” His modified concrete does not crack at all and there is also no shrinkage. Fibers bond so that delayed shrinkage later won’t happen. “Shrinkage is more important to me than strength,” Butler said.

Enhanced thermal performanc­e can prevent condensati­on in the walls and keep heat in via rigid foam insulation without wood or steel forming the wall structure. With new developmen­t in 3D printing and equipment, Butler believes a warm and dry building can be erected if the constructi­on sequence is changed. Windows, doors, electrical outlets, a rain screen, and insulation can all be set in prior to the layered concrete process so that no cutting afterward creates new gaps to plug.

Butler has a finished concrete test building to prove his claims. The concrete, he said “never touches the earth, the water, or the air,” he said. “It has a conditione­d environmen­t. The footings were also poured on insulation which is common in Europe.” He added, “This method could really help with the rebuild of Ukraine and Turkey where all the housing has been destroyed because it can do it faster and better and meet the seismic standards readily.”

Winning an innovation award shows the big corporatio­ns that he is not a crackpot. He noted, “I’m in a middle ground needing tech and hardware elements of constructi­on to see the possibilit­ies.” The hesitancy of corporatio­ns to consider use of his mixture may have more to do with requiring extensive changes in their current software systems. As Butler puts it, “Why innovate when you’re already making money on what you have?”

On the other hand, faster, greener, less expensive constructi­on with his product seems a better way to go in spite of what corporate research and developmen­t and 3D printing hardware have come up with so far. Butler said, “I just see it as a puzzle, and I’ve been working on this puzzle. That’s where my skills are.” He added that the industry had it backward. The question for him is “What is the ideal building?” The answer, he says, is “Let’s build the machines to build the building the way you want it.”

For more detailed informatio­n about Butler’s design and process procedures, go to spacecrete. com.

 ?? CONTRIBUTE­D ?? Michael Butler’s test building made of concrete and his 3D-Admix.
CONTRIBUTE­D Michael Butler’s test building made of concrete and his 3D-Admix.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States