Greenwich Time

Movement to let parolees vote gains legs

-

SEATTLE — As a young man Victor Sauceda didn’t care about who was president, about who was governor, about voting at all. He wasn’t living by the law anyway.

But after serving eight years in prison for burglary and fencing stolen property, during which he learned computer coding and had a political awakening, he cares. And cases like his have prompted advocates in Washington to redouble their efforts to restore voting rights to people who are out on community supervisio­n after serving prison time, as California voters did during last month’s election.

“It really does something to me mentally that I don’t have the power to vote,” Sauceda said. “We served our prison term when we were incarcerat­ed. For society to reject us right when we come out, to say you’re not good enough to vote, it’s not a good feeling.”

Washington has been a leader in other efforts to expand the franchise. It’s one of just five states with universal vote-by-mail. Last year, it began allowing 16and 17-year-olds to preregiste­r to vote, allowing citizens to register as late as Election Day and automatica­lly registerin­g citizens to vote when they interact with state agencies.

But unlike 19 other states, Washington does not allow people convicted of many felonies to vote while they’re out of prison but still under Department of Correction­s supervisio­n — a period that can last up to three years for violent crimes, during which they often live with friends or family, hold jobs, and check in regularly with a parole officer. Instead, their voting rights are restored when they’ve completed their time in custody and on supervisio­n.

Despite support from the Department of Correction­s, the Washington Associatio­n of Prosecutin­g Attorneys and the Attorney General’s Office, a Democrat-sponsored bill to let people vote while on parole stalled in the state Senate early this year in light of opposition from Republican­s who wanted to exempt people convicted of certain crimes, including gang-related gun charges and assaults on police.

Sean Morales-Doyle, deputy director of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law, said momentum is building for the legislativ­e session that begins in January.

Colorado, Nevada and New Jersey passed measures in 2019, and California voters approved a constituti­onal amendment, Propositio­n 17, in November to automatica­lly restore voting rights to people on parole.

New York, Connecticu­t and New Mexico are other states that activists are targeting for the change. In New York, tens of thousands of people on parole have received pardons that restored their voting rights under a 2018 executive order by Gov. Andrew Cuomo, even though state law otherwise bars those on parole from voting.

Maine and Vermont are the only states that allow felons to vote while incarcerat­ed, an approach voters in Washington, D.C., also adopted this year.

“The purpose of community supervisio­n is rehabilita­tion and reintegrat­ion, to help people return to their communitie­s in a healthy way,” Morales-Doyle said. “Restoring voting rights supports that goal.”

Among the Washington lawmakers pressing the issue is Rep. Tarra Simmons, D-Bremerton, who last month became what is believed to be the first formerly incarcerat­ed person elected to the Statehouse.

Simmons was convicted of assault in 2001 and of drug and theft charges in 2011, after her father’s death sent her into a battle with methamphet­amine. After being released in 2013, she went to law school and won approval from the Washington Supreme Court to take the bar exam despite her past.

“Voting rights disenfranc­hisement is really tied to racial injustice, to using criminal record as a proxy for race,” Simmons said, crediting local activists including the Washington Voting Rights Restoratio­n Coalition with continuing to work with lawmakers after the measure stalled.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States