Greenwich Time

Supreme Court dismisses big challenge to Obamacare

-

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court, though increasing­ly conservati­ve in makeup, rejected the latest major Republican-led effort to kill the national health care law known as “Obamacare” on Thursday, preserving insurance coverage for millions of Americans.

The justices, by a 7-2 vote, left the entire Affordable Care Act intact in ruling that Texas, other GOP-led states and two individual­s had no right to bring their lawsuit in federal court. The Biden administra­tion says 31 million people have health insurance because of the law, which also survived two earlier challenges in the Supreme Court.

The law’s major provisions include protection­s for people with existing health conditions, a range of no-cost preventive services, expansion of the Medicaid program that insures lower-income people and access to health insurance markets offering subsidized plans.

“The Affordable Care Act remains the law of the land,” President Joe Biden, said, celebratin­g the ruling. He called for building further on the law that was enacted in 2010 when he was vice president.

Also left in place is the law’s now-toothless requiremen­t that people have health insurance or pay a penalty. Congress rendered that provision irrelevant in 2017 when it reduced the penalty to zero.

The eliminatio­n of the penalty had become the hook that Texas and other GOP-led states, as well as the Trump administra­tion, used to attack the entire law. They argued that without the mandate, a pillar of the law when it was passed, the rest of the law should fall, too.

And with a Supreme Court that includes three appointees of former President Donald Trump, opponents of “Obamacare” hoped a majority of the justices would finally kill the law they have been fighting for more than a decade.

But the third major attack on the law at the Supreme Court ended the way the first two did, with a majority of the court rebuffing efforts to gut the law or get rid of it altogether.

Trump’s appointees — Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — split their votes. Kavanaugh and Barrett joined the majority. Gorsuch was in dissent, signing on to an opinion from Justice Samuel Alito.

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the court that the states and people who filed a federal lawsuit “have failed to show that they have standing to attack as unconstitu­tional the Act’s minimum essential coverage provision.”

In dissent, Alito wrote, “Today’s decision is the third installmen­t in our epic Affordable Care Act trilogy, and it follows the same pattern as installmen­ts one and two. In all three episodes, with the Affordable Care Act facing a serious threat, the Court has pulled off an improbable rescue.” Alito was a dissenter in the two earlier cases in 2012 and 2015, as well.

Like Alito, Justice Clarence Thomas was in dissent in the two earlier cases, but he joined Thursday’s majority, writing, “Although this Court has erred twice before in cases involving the Affordable Care Act, it does not err today.“

Because it dismissed the case for the plaintiff ’s lack of legal standing — the ability to sue — the court didn’t actually rule on whether the individual mandate is unconstitu­tional now that there is no penalty for forgoing insurance. Lower courts had struck down the mandate, in rulings that were wiped away by the Supreme Court decision.

With the latest ruling, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that “the Affordable Care Act is here to stay,” former President Barack Obama said, adding his support to Biden’s call to expand the law.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton pledged to continue the fight against “Obamacare,” which he called a “massive government takeover of health care.”

But it’s not clear what Republican­s can do, said Larry Levitt, an executive vice president for the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation, which studies health care.

“Democrats are in charge and they have made reinvigora­ting and building on the ACA a key priority,” Levitt said. “Republican­s don’t seem to have much enthusiasm for continuing to try to overturn the law.”

Republican­s have pressed their argument to invalidate the whole law even though congressio­nal efforts to rip out the entire law “root and branch,” in Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell’s words, have failed. The closest they came was in July 2017 when Arizona Sen. John McCain, who died the following year, delivered a dramatic thumbs-down vote to a repeal effort by fellow Republican­s.

Chief Justice John Roberts said during arguments in November that it seemed the law’s foes were asking the court to do work best left to the political branches of government.

The court’s decision preserves benefits that have become part of the fabric of the nation’s health care system.

Polls show that the law has grown in popularity as it has endured the heaviest assault. In December 2016, just before Obama left office and Trump swept in calling the ACA a “disaster,” 46 percent of Americans had an unfavorabl­e view of the law, while 43 precent approved, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation tracking poll. Those ratings flipped, and by February of this year 54 percent had a favorable view, while disapprova­l had fallen to 39 percent in the same ongoing poll.

 ?? Samuel Corum / Getty Images/TNS ?? The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.
Samuel Corum / Getty Images/TNS The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States