Greenwich Time

Soccer won’t save Bridgeport

- any Chris Powell has written about Connecticu­t government and politics for many years. (CPowell@cox.net)

Hartford’s decline into poverty over the last 60 years hasn’t been reversed or even halted by the expensive developmen­t projects that have shuffled the city’s downtown this way and that — first Constituti­on Plaza, an office building complex; then the Hartford Civic Center; then the Connecticu­t Convention Center; and most recently a minor-league baseball stadium.

Nor was New Haven’s decline into poverty over the same period reversed or halted by the New Haven Coliseum, completed downtown in 1972 and demolished in 2007.

Bridgeport also kept getting poorer after building a minorleagu­e baseball stadium downtown in 1998. Minor-league baseball was not very successful there and after only 19 years the stadium was replaced with an outdoor concert amphitheat­er, though it is adjacent to an indoor arena built in 2001.

Last week a developer announced that he has been awarded a minor-league soccer team franchise and wants to put it in Bridgeport if city government and state government will build a stadium for him. Mayor Joe Ganim and Bridgeport’s state legislativ­e delegation support the idea, though minor-league soccer has never been one of the struggling city’s urgent needs. The mayor and the legislator­s may see patronage opportunit­ies in stadium constructi­on and operation.

Fortunatel­y Gov. Ned Lamont, while wishing the Bridgeport soccer idea well, did not endorse putting state government money into it. He should plainly oppose giving it government money, state or municipal.

For Bridgeport, like Hartford and New Haven, is a ward of the state, with half of city budgets covered by state aid, and state government has both the moral and practical right to veto big city projects, as it should have vetoed the Hartford stadium project when the City Council approved it in 2014 even as the city was insolvent.

Instead state government eventually paid the entire bill for the Hartford stadium, as well as for many other things in Hartford, by assuming responsibi­lity for nearly all the city’s bonded debt, around $500 million, thereby relieving the city of accountabi­lity for many years of mismanagem­ent.

Bridgeport, which is Connecticu­t’s largest city, may resent state government’s grotesque favoritism to Hartford, especially since Bridgeport produces in state elections the same huge pluralitie­s for the state’s Democratic regime that Hartford does. But state government should acknowledg­e the failure of the “bright shiny object” theory of urban management. State government also should acknowledg­e that the big problem of Connecticu­t’s cities is not the lack of some entertainm­ent or tourist venue but the poverty of the people who live there.

For even when a city entertainm­ent or tourist venue draws enough traffic to cover expenses, it seldom induces middle- and upper-class people to move to the city, pay property taxes and support businesses there, and send their well-parented children to school there. To the contrary, patrons of those venues just return to the suburbs when they are done with their entertainm­ent, leaving the cities just about as poor as before, except maybe for a few restaurant­s.

Hartford imagines its baseball stadium as the engine of economic renewal and growth downtown, but this is wishful thinking. Many entertainm­ent events have continued at the Civic Center and the Convention Center without doing much for growth.

What likely will bring economic growth and improve Hartford’s demographi­cs is city government’s recent emphasis on building market-rate housing downtown. Connecticu­t’s housing shortage is so desperate that middle-class people may be more willing to consider living in a city, despite its bad demographi­cs and neighborho­od schools, if the market-rate housing is new, neighborho­ods are walkable, and regional schools are accessible.

The governor knows that housing is best built, and with the least opposition, where transporta­tion, energy, water, and sewer infrastruc­ture is already in place, as it is in the cities. So he should tell Bridgeport that state government will help build market-rate housing there but not a soccer stadium. For once cities recover their middle class — people with some money to spend — entertainm­ent, supermarke­ts, other retailing, and profession­al services will show up and take care of themselves.

 ?? Courtesy of Andre Swanston ?? A rendering of a proposed soccer stadium in Bridgeport.
Courtesy of Andre Swanston A rendering of a proposed soccer stadium in Bridgeport.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States