Hamilton Journal News

Some in-person ‘public’ meetings return

Local government­s, boards have convened virtually this past year.

- By Josh Sweigart Staff Writer

Local government deliberati­ons and votes once required to be held in-person in front of the public have taken place virtually for the past year because of efforts to limit gatherings amid the coronaviru­s pandemic.

The change was a double-edged sword for public transparen­cy. It led many local government­s to start streaming meetings online, allowing people to watch them from home. But it also limited access to those with the right technology, and sometimes technical glitches made meetings hard to watch or understand.

It also changed how public comments are handled. Instead of someone simply stepping up to a microphone to voice their views on a matter before elected officials, many government­s required comments to be emailed before the meeting so they could be read aloud by officials.

Jack Greiner, a Cincinnati attorney who specialize­s in media law, said he’s not aware of any particular government­s that have faced a backlash over the way they conducted meetings during the pandemic, though some likely faced technologi­cal issues.

“On the upside, the technol

Meetings

ogy in some respects opens up the process in a way that permits more public participat­ion,” he said. “It will be interestin­g to see what happens going forward.”

Ohio’s open meetings law requires public bodies to meet in-person in a public setting. Ohio lawmakers last year passed a law suspending those rules during Gov. Mike DeWine’s COVID19 emergency declaratio­n. That law expires on July 1.

The temporary rules allow virtual meetings. They still require public notice of meetings. Public bodies must provide public access to virtual or electronic meetings. That access can be provided by livestream­ing, local radio or TV broadcast, or other electronic means.

Dayton Public Schools last week returned to in-person meetings.

“If we require our students and staff to come back to work, it seems we should do what we’re preaching,” said DPS board President Mohamed Al-Hamdani.

They are wearing masks, spacing out members of the audience and have glass partitions between board members on the dais. The school board streamed meetings online before the pandemic, but it added ways to watch over the past year, like on Facebook, and will likely continue doing that, Hamdani said.

During virtual meetings, they asked people to email public comments before the meetings and they read them aloud.

“It’s a good idea to listen to the public to get a pulse of what’s going on in the district, what’s going on in the community, how people are feeling,” Al-Hamdani said.

Other government­s meeting in-person include Greene County commission­ers, Beavercree­k,

Miamisburg and West Carrollton.

Some local government­s have faced scrutiny in recent years over transparen­cy relating to their meetings. The Lakota Local School District in Butler County has been sued by a former parent claiming the school board doesn’t properly provide notice or maintain records of meetings.

School district officials say their attorneys are reviewing the allegation­s.

A judge last year ruled that the Bellbrook-Sugarcreek school board violated open meetings laws in 2018 and 2019 by going into improper closed executive sessions and deliberati­ng via text and email.

In conjunctio­n with Sunshine Week this week — a week noting the importance of government transparen­cy — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost updated the Ohio Sunshine Manual.

The manual explains

Ohio’s open meetings and public records laws in layman’s terms so all Ohioans can have the tools to hold their government accountabl­e. The manual can be downloaded for free at www. ohioattorn­eygeneral.gov/ Sunshine.

“Secrecy in any relationsh­ip destroys trust — a friendship, a marriage or a business partnershi­p. Transparen­cy builds trust,” Yost said in a statement along with the updated manual. “More now than ever, we in government need to build trust with those we serve. It starts with openness in public decision-making and the records that document it.”

Staff writers Jeremy Kelley, Bonnie Meibers, India Duke and Eric Schwartzbe­rg contribute­d to this report.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States