Hartford Courant (Sunday)

Lamont: Take Strain Off Middle Class

- New Lamont of Greenwich is the Democratic nominee for governor. The first appeared on the website Medium. By Ned Lamont

This November, voters across Connecticu­t will again have a choice in determinin­g the future of this state. We’ve fallen behind and, now more than ever, it’s crucial to elect a governor with a vision and plan to build a 21st century economy for our state. To do that, we must reduce the property tax burden felt by so many working families, invest in our children’s future, attract more jobs and build an efficient transporta­tion system.

I believe in Connecticu­t and in our future, and I believe we can create a vibrant economy with smart tax cuts, strategic investment­s and doubling down on the priorities that make Connecticu­t a great place to call home.

If Republican­s are allowed to follow through on their radical promises, they would create an additional $11 billion hole in the state’s already strained $18 billion budget, causing property taxes in every one of Connecticu­t’s 169 towns to increase — in some, by well over 100 percent.

Those increases in property tax would only keep municipali­ties at current levels. It would prevent further investment­s in local education and other town and city services, a devastatin­g result considerin­g many schools throughout our state are already underfunde­d.

Connecticu­t’s income taxes account for 61 percent of the revenue in our general fund. Without a new source of revenue, every line item in the budget would have to be cut in half or eliminated entirely. The bulk of these cuts would fall on our middle-class families and the towns in which they live.

State aid represents at least 27 percent of local government revenue — and that’s before the state’s heavy obligation­s for teacher pensions are taken into account. It represents 40 percent of our education budget.

If our towns had to stand on their own, then the state’s largest cities, already cash-strapped, would be hit the hardest. In New Haven, property taxes would increase by 116 percent and the median extra tax bill would be $6,669. In the state’s largest city, Bridgeport, taxpayers would see their property taxes increase by 92 percent and would have to pay $5,864 more each year. Small towns and suburbs would get hit, too. In Coventry, property taxes would go up by 57 percent, an extra $3,242 per year. And in Derby, the property tax hike would be 68 percent — a hit of $3,764.

For Connecticu­t to regain its standing as a place where people want to live, work and raise a family, we need to make our state a place where people can afford to live again.

Voters have a choice this November: to maintain the status quo or revitalize and strengthen our urban centers to be the economic engines that drive our state toward future success.

I believe in building a Connecticu­t for the 21st century. To do that, we need to enhance the vibrancy of our towns and cities by investing in education and our transporta­tion infrastruc­ture, so we can attract new businesses and residents to the region as we create more jobs.

As governor, I would do what I did as a successful entreprene­ur and executive: stretch dollars, eliminate inefficien­cies, leverage new technologi­es and bring stakeholde­rs to the table to decrease costs.

Last week, I unveiled a realistic proposal to cut property taxes for the middle class. The budget has been balanced on the backs of the middle class for too long, and working families are struggling. My proposal targeted to the middle class would give the average beneficiar­y nearly $700 more in their wallets annually. It’s a smart step that reverses a Gov.Dannel P. Malloy tax increase.

Republican nominee Bob Stefanowsk­i’s plan to create an $11 billion hole would eliminate funds for economic developmen­t programs, our state colleges and universiti­es, public safety, environmen­tal protection, job training and health care for one in every five residents.

Unless Stefanowsk­i plans to default on our debts, quadruple sales taxes to more than 25 percent, or simply begin printing money, what’s left in the general fund will be taken up by the state’s fixed obligation­s. There will be nothing left for our towns.

The impact of Stefanowsk­i’s tax plan would be felt across our state by all our residents, either through massive tax increases or extraordin­ary cuts to priorities like education.

He is making the same kind of dishonest campaign promises that got our state into a fiscal mess in the first place, and I believe we need to change how we do business in Connecticu­t to get our state back on the right track.

My bold, new vision for the state puts residents at the forefront and creates equal opportunit­ies for all Connecticu­t residents, while steadying the state’s financial footing.

 ?? PATRICK RAYCRAFT | PRAYCRAFT @COURANT.COM ?? NED LAMONT, the Democratic candidate for governor, says that if the income tax is eliminated, the bulk of the resulting budget cuts would fall on middle-class families and the towns in which they live.
PATRICK RAYCRAFT | PRAYCRAFT @COURANT.COM NED LAMONT, the Democratic candidate for governor, says that if the income tax is eliminated, the bulk of the resulting budget cuts would fall on middle-class families and the towns in which they live.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States