Hartford Courant (Sunday)

Comfort at the cost of less protection

- By Tara Parker-Pope

Face shields and valved masks — two options many people find more comfortabl­e than cloth face coverings — appear to be less effective at blocking viral particles than regular masks, a new study shows.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had already stated that clear plastic face shields and masks equipped with vents or valves are not recommende­d, because of concerns that they don’t adequately block viral particles. But the new research, which uses lasers to illuminate the path of coughs, offers a striking visual demonstrat­ion of how large plumes of particles can escape from behind a face shield or vented mask.

“I think these visualizat­ions are really powerful for helping the general public to see and understand what’s happening,” said Linsey Marr, a professor of civil and environmen­tal engineerin­g at Virginia Tech who studies airborne particles but who was not involved in the research.

The news will be disappoint­ing to those looking for an alternativ­e to regular face masks. Teachers and students, in particular, often prefer face shields because they are more comfortabl­e to wear over long periods of time, can be easily cleaned and allow for better communicat­ion because they don’t muffle the voice or hide facial expression­s. Valved masks, with one-way vents designed to allow breath to escape while blocking germs

from entering, can feel more breathable and prevent the mask from getting moist as quickly.

But the new research, published in the journal Physics of Fluids, shows that face shields and vented masks allow large plumes of particles to escape, putting those around you at risk. And while the research did not specifical­ly look at the level of protection the shields and masks offer the wearer, it does suggest that people who use them may also be more vulnerable to exposure than if they wore a regular mask. Valved masks are a particular concern as some of the nonmedical vented masks the researcher­s used had faulty valves, suggesting that some people may be walking around with open valves — essentiall­y large holes — in their masks.

To conduct the research, scientists from Florida Atlantic University used hollow foam heads fitted with various face coverings. They pumped a vaporized mixture of glycerin and distilled water through the heads to simulate a cough or sneeze, and used lasers to illuminate the path of the plume.

In two separate studies, the researcher­s showed that even the best masks allow some particles to escape. In videos of tests using the gold-standard mask, an N95, a puff of particles can be seen jetting out around the bridge of the nose, where the fit is poor. That said, the researcher­s found that N95 masks, cloth masks and papery medical-style masks all block a significan­t amount of particles and appear to offer adequate protection for the typical person in the community who is practicing social distancing.

But when the hollow heads were fitted with clear plastic face shields or valved masks, the results were less encouragin­g. While the face shields did a good job blocking the initial splatter from the simulated cough, the laser illuminati­on showed that plumes of aerosolize­d particles swirled out from under the shield.

“Masks act as filters and actually capture the droplets and any other particles we expel,” said Siddhartha Verma, assistant professor in the department of ocean and mechanical engineerin­g at Florida Atlantic University and the study’s lead author. “Shields are not able to do that. If the droplets are large they will be stopped by the plastic shield. But if they are aerosol sized, 10 microns or smaller, they’ll just escape from the sides or the bottom of the shield. Everything that is expelled will very likely get distribute­d in the room.”

When a standard N95 mask with a valve was tested, a large cloud of particles also escaped through the valve, but the vent directed the plume downward. Standard N95 masks with valves meet standards set by the Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion. Even so, valved respirator masks are not allowed in sterile medical environmen­ts because they allow the wearer’s germs to escape. During the pandemic, a number of knockoff versions of valved masks have appeared on the market, and while the valves look authentic, they don’t really work.

In a mask with a working valve, the pressure inside the masks forces a small disk to open and let air out, but when you inhale the disk fits tightly against the hole and doesn’t allow air in. “What we found was that everything escapes through that exhalation valve,” said Manhar R. Dhanak, a study co-author and chairman of the university’s department of ocean and mechanical engineerin­g. “And in some of the non-N95 commercial masks, the valve just appeared to be cosmetic. They didn’t function because they were of poor quality, so the disks basically didn’t move out and in as we’d expect them to.”

While the study allowed the researcher­s to compare the relative effectiven­ess of various masks and face shields, the methods used did not quantify the volume or size of the particles that escaped.

The research is unlikely to be the final word on face shields. A 2014 study has often been cited as evidence that face shields offer extra protection to the person wearing them, but even that study concluded that the benefit was limited. While the face shields protected the wearer from large cough splatters, they were less effective against smaller coughs and aerosols. And after the cough, as larger particles settled to the ground and aerosols dispersed around the room, the face shield reduced aerosol inhalation by only 23%.

For some people, a face shield may still be the best option. For instance, a child with developmen­tal disabiliti­es may be more inclined to use a face shield than a mask. Although the findings suggest that a cloth or surgical mask offers more protection, experts say that any face covering is better than nothing at all and that face shields will keep some portion of large coughs and sneezes from splatterin­g on the people around them.

For most people, a cloth mask of at least two layers, which covers the face from the nose to under the chin, is the best option.

“A good homemade mask works very well,” said Verma. “If it’s comfortabl­e, it can be worn for long periods of time. Definitely try to avoid shields only or masks with valves.”

 ?? KARSTEN MORAN/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? A shopper decked out in face shield and respirator leaves a Manhattan store on Aug. 20. New research shows that face shields and vented masks allow large plumes of particles to escape.
KARSTEN MORAN/THE NEW YORK TIMES A shopper decked out in face shield and respirator leaves a Manhattan store on Aug. 20. New research shows that face shields and vented masks allow large plumes of particles to escape.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States