Hartford Courant (Sunday)

Why do we fear fevers?

Medical experts say they’re beneficial under most circumstan­ces, reducing the severity of the illness and shortening its length

- By Jane E. Brody

Among the measures my local Y is using to prevent the spread of COVID-19, instant temperatur­es are taken with a forehead scanner before people can enter the building. Curious to know how “hot” I was one cold, rainy day, I asked the attendant what it registered: 96.2.

The last time my temperatur­e was checked in a medical setting it was 97.5. Whatever happened to 98.6, the degrees Fahrenheit that I and most doctors have long considered normal body temperatur­e?

As if reading my mind, Dr. Philippa Gordon, a Brooklyn pediatrici­an, sent me an article, “People’s Bodies Now Run Cooler Than ‘Normal’ — Even in the Bolivian Amazon,” by Michael Gurven and Thomas Kraft, anthropolo­gists at the University of California at Santa Barbara.

As they wrote in The Conversati­on, “There is no single universal ‘normal’ body temperatur­e for everyone at all times.” Rather, body temperatur­e varies, not only from one person to another, but also over the course of the day — lower in the morning, higher in the evening; rising during and after exercise; varying at times in the menstrual cycle, and at different ages — lower for old-timers like me.

Furthermor­e, researcher­s who took hundreds of thousands of temperatur­e readings from people in Palo Alto, California, found that 97.5 was the new normal, down about a degree from what German physician Dr. Carl Wunderlich establishe­d in 1867 in a study of 25,000 people. (Wunderlich’s research did find that “normal” body temperatur­e ranged from 97.2 to 99.5.)

In reviewing data from 1862 through 2017, Dr.

Julie Parsonnet, a professor of medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine, and co-authors found a steady decline in average body temperatur­e of about 0.05 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. She has observed that at least 75% of normal temperatur­es are now below 98.6.

If my body temperatur­e registered 98.6, would that mean I have a fever? Possibly, said Sharon S. Evans, a professor of oncology and immunology at Roswell Park Comprehens­ive Cancer Center in Buffalo, New York, even though 100.4 is generally considered the lower end of the fever spectrum.

In a review written with Elizabeth Repasky and Daniel Fisher, Evans showed that under most circumstan­ces, fever is beneficial, reducing the severity of illness and shortening its length. (She emphasized that patients should follow their doctors’ advice about taking medication­s to reduce fever.)

“Fever acts to mobilize multiple arms on the immune system, a function that is remarkably well conserved across many, many species — both warmbloode­d and coldbloode­d,” she said. “Fever affects every aspect of the immune system to make it work better.”

For starters, Evans said, fever activates innate immunity — the mobilizati­on of white blood cells: neutrophil­s that patrol the body for pathogens and macrophage­s that gobble them up. Macrophage­s, in turn, send out an alarm that help is needed, prompting adaptive immunity — T cells and B cells — into action. These cells initiate a specific response to the invader: the production of antibodies days later.

“Treating fever can prolong or worsen illness,” Dr. Paul Offit, vaccinolog­ist at the University of Pennsylvan­ia, stated in “Hippocrate­s Was Right: Treating Fever Is a Bad Idea,” a YouTube presentati­on by the College of Physicians of Philadelph­ia. Immunity, both innate and adaptive, “works better at higher temperatur­es,” he said.

Thus, when you take medication like acetaminop­hen (Tylenol and its generic forms) or ibuprofen to suppress a fever, you actually work against the inherent protective benefits nature bestowed. Yes, a fever reducer would probably make you feel better, relieving symptoms like headache, muscle aches and fatigue. But, Offit emphasized: “You’re not supposed to feel better. You’re supposed to stay under the covers, keep warm and ride out the infection,” not go out and spread it to others.

“We have fevers for a reason,” he said. Fever helps to reduce viral shedding and shorten the length of illnesses like the flu.

Grandma’s proverbial common cold remedy of hot chicken soup probably helps because the steam raises the temperatur­e of nasal passages, repressing reproducti­on of the virus, he suggested.

So why are we so hellbent on suppressin­g fevers? Fear is one reason, said Gordon, the Brooklyn pediatrici­an, who said frantic parents often called in the middle of the night when a child’s fever spiked. She suggested that doctors warn parents ahead of time to expect a nighttime rise in a child’s fever and explain that high fevers from an infection are not damaging.

“The body has a built-in thermostat — the hypothalam­us — that keeps temperatur­es from getting high enough to cause damage,” she said, and febrile seizures (brief convulsion­s, shaking and perhaps loss of consciousn­ess that affect some young children) result from how fast temperatur­es rise, not how high they get.

“Febrile seizures are creepy and terrifying for parents to watch, but they don’t cause any damage,” Gordon said. She added, however, that fever is worrisome in very young babies who have immature immune systems and haven’t yet been vaccinated against serious diseases.

An important caveat about high fevers: Unlike fevers resulting from an infection, there is no natural shut-off for environmen­tally induced fevers, such as might occur if a child is shut in a hot car or an overdresse­d athlete overexerci­ses on a hot day.

Consumers should also consider how a temperatur­e is taken before interpreti­ng the results. An ear temperatur­e is usually slightly higher than an oral temperatur­e, which in turn is higher than an armpit temperatur­e or a forehead scan.

 ?? GRACIA LAM/THE NEW YORK TIMES ??
GRACIA LAM/THE NEW YORK TIMES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States