Hartford Courant (Sunday)

HIIT-ing harder and often may not be better

Study: Exercising at high intensity may harm mitochondr­ia

- By Gretchen Reynolds

If high-intensity exercise is good for us, is more necessaril­y better?

Maybe not, according to an admonitory new study of the molecular effects of high-intensity interval training, also known as HIIT. In the study, people who began working out strenuousl­y almost every day developed sudden and severe declines in the function of their mitochondr­ia, which are the energy powerhouse­s inside of cells, along with incipient signs of blood sugar dysfunctio­n.

Their metabolic issues started to reverse when they dialed back on their workouts but did not disappear, suggesting that the benefits of extremely vigorous exercise may depend on just how much we do.

At this point, almost anyone with an interest in fitness is familiar with the concept and appeal of high-intensity interval training. Consisting of repeated, brief spurts of hard exercise interspers­ed with a few minutes of rest, HIIT workouts can be quite short but are still able to improve substantia­lly our aerobic fitness and many other aspects of our health. Studies show, for example, that intense bursts of exercise increase the number of mitochondr­ia in our muscle cells, and more mitochondr­ia are thought to contribute to better cellular and metabolic health.

But recent research has begun to hint that HIIT also may have unexpected downsides. In a study I wrote about earlier this year, people who worked out with HIIT routines three times a week for six weeks did not improve their blood pressure or body fat as much as people who exercised far more moderately five times a week.

The authors of that study speculated that, by being sedentary for four days each week, the intense exercisers in the study may have undermined the otherwise potent effects of their HIIT sessions. On a weekly basis, they were not exercising enough.

But whether it would be advisable to do more HIIT sessions in a single week has not been clear. Most past studies and formal recommenda­tions about intense workouts top out at three sessions a week, and few researcher­s have looked into how HIIT-ing harder or more often might affect health.

So, for the new study, which was published recently in the journal Cell Metabolism, researcher­s at the Swedish School of

Sport and Health Sciences and the Karolinska Institute, both in Stockholm, set out, like Goldilocks, to sample different amounts of weekly hard exercise and see if any might be just right.

They began by recruiting 11 healthy men and women who exercised but were not competitiv­e athletes. These volunteers visited the researcher­s’ lab for tests of their fitness and metabolic health, including bloodsugar levels over the course of a day.

Then the volunteers began an ambitious exercise program. During the first week, they performed two sessions of HIIT, repeating four-minute intervals five times on a stationary bicycle, with three minutes of rest in between. The riders pedaled as hard as they could during each four-minute surge, while researcher­s monitored their power output. Afterward, the researcher­s biopsied leg muscles and rechecked the riders’ fitness and 24-hour bloodsugar control.

During week two, the riders added a third HIIT session and ramped up the length of some of their intervals to a draining eight minutes. In week three, they worked out five times, with a mix of four-minute and eight-minute spurts of all-out pedaling. Finally, in week four, for recovery, they effectivel­y halved the amount and intensity of their exercise. Each week, the researcher­s repeated all testing.

Then they compared how people’s bodies had changed week over week.

At first, the findings were encouragin­g. By the end of week two, the riders were pedaling harder and appeared to be getting fitter, with better daily blood-sugar control and more total mitochondr­ia in their muscle cells. Each of these mitochondr­ia was also more efficient now, producing greater amounts of energy than at the start.

But something began to go wrong during week three. The volunteers’ ability to generate power while cycling flattened, and their subsequent muscle biopsies showed sputtering mitochondr­ia, each of which was now producing only about 60% as much energy as during the previous week. The riders’ blood-sugar control also slipped, with seesawing spikes and dips throughout the day.

After a week of lower-intensity riding, their mitochondr­ia started to bounce back, producing more energy, but still 25% less than during week two. Their blood-sugar levels also stabilized, but again, not to the same extent as before. The riders could pedal, however, with the same — or even greater — vigor as in week two.

Taken as a whole, the monthlong experiment suggests that “HIIT exercise should not be excessive if increased health is a desired outcome,” says Mikael Flockhart, a doctoral student at the Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, who conducted the study with his adviser, Filip Larsen, and others.

The study was not focused on athletic performanc­e, but even for serious athletes, he says, piling on multiple, intense, interval workouts each week, with little rest between them, is likely to lead to a tipping point, after which performanc­e, as well as indicators of metabolic health, slip.

The researcher­s are not sure precisely what changes within their volunteers’ bodies and muscles precipitat­ed the negative results in week three. They tested multiple potential molecular causes, Mr. Flockhart says, but did not isolate an obvious, single instigator. He and his colleagues suspect that a cascade of biochemica­l changes within the muscles during the hardest week of exercise overwhelme­d the mitochondr­ia, and then the weakened mitochondr­ia contribute­d to the disruption­s in people’s bloodsugar control.

This study was small, though, and short-term, with barely a week of each exercise routine. It also featured healthy volunteers, so it does not show whether results would be the same, better or worse in people with existing metabolic problems.

Even so, the findings strongly suggest that anyone interested in high-intensity interval training start small, Mr. Flockhart says. Train a few times a week and on the remaining days, maybe take a walk.

 ?? CHRISTOPHE­R SMITH/THE NEW YORK TIMES ??
CHRISTOPHE­R SMITH/THE NEW YORK TIMES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States