Hartford Courant (Sunday)

Long road ahead

- By Stanley A. Twardy Jr. Stanley A. Twardy Jr. is a partner with Day Pitney and a former U.S. attorney for the District of Connecticu­t.

Irecall more than 30 years ago, when I was U.S. attorney for the District of Connecticu­t, writing an opinion piece on the war on drugs and the need to be vigilant in fighting it — a war that included marijuana as one of its targets. Now, here we are in 2022 and cannabis is legal in Connecticu­t for both medical and recreation­al usage. Times change, and we need to change with them. The new law that took effect last year making Connecticu­t the 18th state to legalize recreation­al cannabis was the end of a lengthy process and the beginning of another one. Following the long march toward legalizati­on, for which many had passionate­ly advocated for and against for many years, we must now carefully construct the appropriat­e apparatus needed to regulate this brand new area of commerce for the state.

Not only is this a brand new business model, but unlike areas such as liquor regulation­s, there is little to no common law around the cannabis industry. This will create challenges for any new business looking to operate in this new arena. Beyond that, a number of other questions exist.

The most significan­t challenge the lack of common law creates is uncertaint­y, which will be one of the most difficult challenges entreprene­urs entering this new industry will face.

Some states that have legalized the use and sale of recreation­al cannabis have issued lengthy regulation­s seeking to address many of the issues surroundin­g regulation. Implementa­tion of an entirely new industry is complicate­d by the fact that the business model upon which the industry is based — the use and sale of cannabis — remains prohibited at the federal level. While the regulation­s are a step in the right direction, they leave much to interpreta­tion, which will need to be addressed by the court system through the developmen­t of common law.

It goes without saying that implementa­tion of any new area of regulation is a difficult task. The

devil is, indeed, in the details.

Cannabis legalizati­on began as a relatively simple discussion of whether, and to what extent, the government should legalize and regulate a particular substance. I say “relatively” in the sense that the various positions, and the evidence and arguments to support those positions, was confined in scope and familiar to many of the participan­ts.

But once the decision was made to legalize trade, the number of stakeholde­rs — and the number of issues those stakeholde­rs care about — increased greatly, transcendi­ng the original cannabis policy issues.

In short, there are a number of areas that any stakeholde­r looking to navigate through the new regulatory framework around recreation­al cannabis sale and cultivatio­n will need to consider. There are five major issues:

Zoning: Cannabis dispensari­es, growth facilities and distributi­on facilities will confront traditiona­l zoning issues, which will be complicate­d by the subject matter.

Social justice issues: The legalizati­on of cannabis always has raised social justice concerns. Implementa­tion now brings with it interest in remedial social justice efforts. For instance, should licensing allocation, or geographic distributi­on be determined in part by social justice policies? Should there be restitutio­n made to historical­ly underrepre­sented communitie­s? These questions and others will no doubt be considered by the legislativ­e and executive branches.

Tax: A major driver of cannabis legalizati­on was the prospect of increased tax revenue. Implementa­tion will involve imposition of and allocation of that revenue, a process sure to be difficult.

Banking: While the federal government lags behind the states, with the exception of banking, that lag does not appear to have practical effect. Banking is a huge exception. The inability to conduct business using traditiona­l financial transactio­ns in banking institutio­ns will create difficult problems.

Employment: The inevitable increase in state-legal cannabis use will (and already has) create an array of thorny employment issues, many of which will intersect with already-complicate­d health privacy concerns.

It’s a brave new world for what could be a lucrative new industry in Connecticu­t. But it’s one where there are still a number of hurdles that need clearing before it can truly launch. In short, this is a long and winding road to be traveled before cannabis becomes an accepted and integrated vehicle of commerce.

 ?? HARTFORD COURANT ?? An employee tends to plants in Simsbury’s Curaleaf cultivatio­n facility for medical marijuana in February 2020.
HARTFORD COURANT An employee tends to plants in Simsbury’s Curaleaf cultivatio­n facility for medical marijuana in February 2020.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States