Hartford Courant (Sunday)

The niche market of octagonal homes

Adherents argued unconventi­onal shape was healthier, made more efficient use of space

- By Jim Zarroli

Lawrence Mauro is used to strangers gawking at the eight-sided 1860 house he owns in Stockport, New York. And for the most part, he’s fine with it. But one day a few years ago, the curiosity got out of hand.

“I had dislocated a disc,” he said, recalling that he was in a lot of pain and needed to go to the hospital. “And the two ambulance drivers come in with the gurney, and one of them says, ‘Oh, I’ve always wanted to know what the inside of this house looked like.’ And I said, ‘Not now!’ ”

The house owned by Mauro, 62, a retired landscape architect who worked for the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, and his husband, Bob Pesce, 70, a ceramic artist, is one of nearly 1,500 octagonal homes built in North America during a brief 19th-century fad. The unconventi­onal shape was healthier and made more efficient use of space, their adherents argued.

More than 300 of those houses are still standing, mostly in the Northeast and Midwest, said Ellen Puerzer, a historian whose website is a clearingho­use for informatio­n about octagonal houses. And in some places, octagons are still being built, thanks to their panoramic views and slight advantage over convention­al homes at resisting hurricane-force winds. But with their odd angles and rooms shaped like slices of pie, they aren’t for everyone. They can be difficult to furnish and repair. And they almost always attract attention.

Their fans wouldn’t have it any other way.

When Roberta Walsh and her husband, Stephen Walsh, first saw the 1849 octagon built by Linus

Yale Sr., a lock tycoon, in Newport, New York, it was love at first sight. Made of limestone, with a spiral staircase, stone pillars and a cupola, the house looked like a castle, she thought.

“We said, ‘Holy moly! We are never going to have an opportunit­y like this ever again in our whole lives. We’ve got to buy this house,’ ” said Roberta Walsh, now 69, a retired librarian who worked at Ulster County Community College.

Getting inside wasn’t easy. Although the house had been on the market for a while, so many curiosity seekers had asked to tour it that the listing agent had stopped returning calls, she said. But she and her husband, now 70, a retired software engineer who worked for IBM, persisted. In 2005, they bought the house for $180,000 and moved to the Herkimer County village from their Hudson Valley home three hours south.

Settling in has been difficult, because of the shape of the rooms. When the couple try to figure out where furniture should go, “we make each other crazy,” Roberta Walsh said. “I’ll line a sofa up on one wall, and then he’ll come in and say, ‘No, no, no, no, no. It’s got to move out this way. You’ve got to pull this end out.’ And I’ll push it back. And he’ll pull it out.”

But what the Walshes regard as a creative challenge was once seen as an advantage — or at least a small price to pay, given the benefits of living in an octagon. Orson Fowler, an amateur architect who popularize­d octagonal buildings in the 19th century, made elaborate claims about their aesthetic superiorit­y and health benefits. (Notably, he was also the country’s foremost proponent of phrenology, the pseudoscie­nce of

reading people’s characters by studying the bumps on their heads.)

Buildings were more visually appealing when they were round, like fruit, Fowler maintained. In his 1848 book, “The Octagon House: A Home for All,” he wrote: “The more acute the angle, the less beautiful; but the more the angle approaches the circle, the more beautiful.”

Because round houses were expensive to build, Fowler settled on the octagon as the next best thing. With windows on all sides, octagonal homes had more light and better airflow, so they were healthier to live in, he claimed, and they made better use of space. “All the rooms are united, so that you could go from one to another, without being obliged to pass through a cold and cheerless entry,” he wrote.

Joseph Pell Lombardi, an architect who owns and restored the magnificen­t Armour-Stiner House, in Irvington, New York, agrees that the many windows provide prodigious light. “In a square or rectangula­r house, there are times of day when the sun’s hitting the corner, and there’s less light coming in the house,” said Lombardi, 82. “In an octagonal house, as the sun goes around, the different rooms stay in sunshine. That’s just terrific.”

Because many octagonal homes have central staircases that open to the roof, they tend to enjoy good ventilatio­n, making them easier to cool. But that can also be true of more convention­ally shaped houses with roof access, Lombardi noted.

And he is skeptical about Fowler’s claim that

eight-sided houses make better use of space. These houses typically have some square rooms, he said, but because of the exterior shape, many of the leftover spaces are inevitably triangular. In smaller houses, those rooms are often used as pantries and closets; in bigger houses, they become something of a design problem.

When octagons are built today, it is usually in resort areas, where the many windows make them popular with vacationer­s, or in places prone to hurricanes. That’s because octagons tend to have hip roofs that are bolted down on more sides, so they’re less likely to fly off than a typical gable roof, said Anne Cope, chief engineer at the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety, an industry group that researches how to protect homes and businesses from severe weather.

Octagonal homes remain something of a niche market, said Jonathan Hallam, a real estate agent with the Kinderhook Group, who once owned Mauro and Pesce’s house. When one of them comes on the market, he said, it tends to attract a certain kind of person: “Someone who is passionate about art and architectu­re, and really wants to live in something unique.”

As he put it, “It’s a rarefied buyer.”

Those who like octagons, however, tend to be devoted to them. Walsh, for one, has never regretted her decision to buy an octagonal home.

“Every time we pull in the driveway,” she said, “I think the people who live in this house are the luckiest people in the world.”

 ?? TONY CENICOLA/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Roberta and Steve Walsh stand Dec. 5 in front of their octagonal home in Newport, N.Y.
TONY CENICOLA/THE NEW YORK TIMES Roberta and Steve Walsh stand Dec. 5 in front of their octagonal home in Newport, N.Y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States